...
首页> 外文期刊>Osteoporosis international: a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA >Osteoporosis case finding in the general practice: phalangeal radiographic absorptiometry with and without risk factors for osteoporosis to select postmenopausal women eligible for lumbar spine and hip densitometry.
【24h】

Osteoporosis case finding in the general practice: phalangeal radiographic absorptiometry with and without risk factors for osteoporosis to select postmenopausal women eligible for lumbar spine and hip densitometry.

机译:在一般实践中发现骨质疏松症的案例:在有或没有骨质疏松症危险因素的情况下进行趾骨X线骨密度仪选择适合腰椎和臀部密度测定的绝经后妇女。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Mass screening for osteoporosis using DXA measurements at the spine and hip is presently not recommended by health authorities. Instead, risk factor questionnaires and peripheral bone measurements may facilitate the selection of women eligible for axial bone densitometry. The aim of this study was to validate a case finding strategy for postmenopausal women who would benefit most from subsequent DXA measurement by using phalangeal radiographic absorptiometry (RA) alone or in combination with risk factors in a general practice setting. The sensitivity and specificity of this strategy in detecting osteoporosis (T-score < or =2.5 SD at the spine and/or the hip) were compared with those of the current reimbursement criteria for DXA measurements in Switzerland. Four hundred and twenty-three postmenopausal women with one or more risk factors for osteoporosis were recruited by 90 primary care physicians who also performed the phalangeal RA measurements. All women underwent subsequent DXA measurement of the spine and the hip at the Osteoporosis Policlinic of the University Hospital of Berne. They were allocated to one of two groups depending on whether they matched with the Swiss reimbursement conditions for DXA measurement or not. Logistic regression models were used to predict the likelihood of osteoporosis versus "no osteoporosis" and to derive ROC curves for the various strategies. Differences in the areas under the ROC curves (AUC) were tested for significance. In women lacking reimbursement criteria, RA achieved a significantly larger AUC (0.81; 95% CI 0.72-0.89) than the risk factors associated with patients' age, height and weight (0.71; 95% C.I. 0.62-0.80). Furthermore, in this study, RA provided a better sensitivity and specificity in identifying women with underlying osteoporosis than the currently accepted criteria for reimbursement of DXA measurement. In the Swiss environment, RA is a valid case finding tool for patients with risk factors for osteoporosis, especially for those who do not qualify for DXA reimbursement.
机译:目前,卫生部门不建议在脊柱和臀部使用DXA测量进行骨质疏松症的大规模筛查。取而代之的是,危险因素调查表和外周骨测量可能有助于选择适合进行轴向骨密度测定的女性。这项研究的目的是验证绝经后妇女的病例发现策略,这些妇女可以通过单独使用指骨放射线吸光法(RA)或结合危险因素在常规实践中从后续的DXA测量中受益最大。将这种策略在检测骨质疏松症(脊柱和/或髋部的T评分<或= 2.5 SD)的敏感性和特异性与瑞士DXA测量的现行报销标准进行了比较。 90名初级保健医师招募了432名具有一种或多种骨质疏松症危险因素的绝经后妇女,她们还进行了指骨RA测量。随后,在伯尔尼大学医院的骨质疏松症政策中对所有妇女进行了脊柱和臀部的DXA测量。根据它们是否与DXA测量的瑞士偿还条件相匹配,将它们分配给两个组之一。使用逻辑回归模型来预测骨质疏松与“无骨质疏松”的可能性,并得出各种策略的ROC曲线。测试了ROC曲线(AUC)下面积的差异的显着性。在没有报销标准的女性中,RA的AUC(0.81; 95%CI 0.72-0.89)明显大于与患者年龄,身高和体重相关的危险因素(0.71; 95%C.I. 0.62-0.80)。此外,在这项研究中,与目前公认的DXA测量报销标准相比,RA在识别潜在的骨质疏松症患者中提供了更好的敏感性和特异性。在瑞士环境中,RA是具有骨质疏松症危险因素的患者(特别是对于不符合DXA报销条件的患者)的有效病例发现工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号