首页> 外文期刊>Osteoarthritis and cartilage >OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, Part II: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008;16:137-62.
【24h】

OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, Part II: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008;16:137-62.

机译:OARSI关于髋和膝骨关节炎治疗的建议,第二部分:OARSI基于证据的专家共识性指南。骨关节炎软骨2008; 16:137-62。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The recent expert-consensus guidelines for the management of knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA) are very insightful and should serve as a powerful clinical tool for many providers1. Although minimal attention is given to the positive effects of manual physical therapy despite strong randomized control trials (RCT) in the literature2'3, the fact that the panel unanimously recommends evaluation and referral to a physical therapist is promising. These RCT's evaluating-manual physical therapy were included in the OsteoArthritis Research Society International (OARSI) panel's literature review, however the emphasis of the actual recommendation appears to be focused more on the provision of assisted devices for ambulation, although none of the RCT's referenced in that section include that as a studied intervention. As in many other disciplines, the specific intervention provided by a clinician can vary. When evaluating the efficacy of these interventions it is important for the medical provider to distinguish between current practice and best evidence-based practice when interpreting the results published in the literature. In this case, recommendations would be better served based on specific evidence-validated interventions provided by physical therapists. In addition, the statement that no RCT's for management of hip OA by a physical therapist exist might imply a lack of thoroughness in the literature review for this portion. In a 2004 RCT in Arthritis and Rheumatism by Hoeksma et at., a 5-week manual therapy program was shown to be significantlysuperior to exercise therapy not only in general perceived improvement, but also in pain, hip function, walking speed, range of motion, and quality of life4.
机译:最近有关膝盖和髋骨关节炎(OA)的专家共识指南非常有见地,应作为许多医疗服务提供者的有力工具。尽管在文献2中进行了强力的随机对照试验(RCT),尽管很少关注手动物理疗法的积极作用,但专家组一致建议评估并转介给物理治疗师这一事实是有希望的。这些RCT的评估-手动物理疗法已包括在国际骨关节炎研究协会(OARSI)小组的文献综述中,但是,尽管未在RCT中提及任何RCT,但实际推荐的重点似乎更多地集中在提供移动辅助设备上。该部分将其作为研究干预措施。与许多其他学科一样,临床医生提供的具体干预措施也可能有所不同。在评估这些干预措施的有效性时,对于医疗提供者来说,在解释文献中发表的结果时,区分当前的实践和最佳的循证实践非常重要。在这种情况下,根据物理治疗师提供的经过特定证据验证的干预措施,可以更好地提供建议。另外,没有物理治疗师治疗髋骨OA的RCT的说法可能暗示该部分文献综述不够透彻。在2004年Hoeksma等人在《关节炎和风湿病的RCT》中,一项为期5周的手动治疗方案被证明在运动疗法方面不仅明显优于一般的感觉改善,而且在疼痛,髋部功能,步行速度,运动范围方面也明显优于运动疗法以及生活质量4。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号