首页> 外文期刊>Organometallics >Density functional theory calculations on 19-electron organometallic complexes: The Mn(CO)(5)Cl- anion. The difference between unpaired electron density and spin density due to spin polarization
【24h】

Density functional theory calculations on 19-electron organometallic complexes: The Mn(CO)(5)Cl- anion. The difference between unpaired electron density and spin density due to spin polarization

机译:19电子有机金属配合物的密度泛函理论计算:Mn(CO)(5)Cl-阴离子。自旋极化导致不成对电子密度与自旋密度之间的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The anisotropic hyperfine coupling (hfc) constants for the 19-electron Mn(CO)(5)Cl- complex, 1, and for the 17-electron Mn(CO)(4)Cl- complex, 2, were calculated using density functional theory (DFT). The calculated hfc values for 1 are in good agreement with the experimental ones reported in two EPR studies, which were not able to distinguish between 1 and 2. The Mn-CO(axial) bond dissociation energy in 1 was calculated to be 19 kcal/mol, which shows that 1 is stable to loss of axial CO. These data indicate that the species observed in the EPR experiments was the 19-electron complex, 1. The unpaired electron population of the manganese d(z)(2) orbital indicated by the SOMO of the DFT wave function (ca. 0.2-0.3) is significantly less than that obtained from the two EPR analyses (0.49, 0.63), which neglected spin polarization. The calculations show that spin polarization in 1 causes the spin density (as measured by EPR) to differ significantly from the unpaired electron density(SOMO). It is concluded that neglect of spin polarization in the EPR analysis of open-shell transition metal compounds may lead to an overestimate of the unpaired electron population on the metal. The standard method for estimating atomic orbital populations by ratioing the observed hfc in a molecule to the atomic hfc is not reliable for organometallic compounds. [References: 38]
机译:使用密度泛函计算了19电子Mn(CO)(5)Cl-配合物1和17电子Mn(CO)(4)Cl-配合物2的各向异性超精细耦合(hfc)常数。理论(DFT)。计算得出的1的hfc值与两次EPR研究中报告的实验值高度一致,无法区分1和2。1中的Mn-CO(轴向)键解离能经计算为19 kcal /摩尔,表明1对轴向CO的损失是稳定的。这些数据表明,在EPR实验中观察到的物质是19电子络合物1。锰d(z)(2)轨道的未成对电子种群表明DFT波函数的SOMO值(约0.2-0.3)明显小于从两个EPR分析(0.49、0.63)获得的结果,后者忽略了自旋极化。计算结果表明,自旋极化1导致自旋密度(通过EPR测量)与不成对电子密度(SOMO)明显不同。结论是,在开壳过渡金属化合物的EPR分析中忽视自旋极化可能会导致金属上未成对电子种群的高估。对于有机金属化合物,通过将分子中观察到的hfc与原子hfc的比例来估算原子轨道总体的标准方法是不可靠的。 [参考:38]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号