首页> 外文期刊>Ophthalmic & physiological optics: the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) >A comparison of in-air and in-saline focimeter measurement of the back vertex power of spherical soft contact lenses
【24h】

A comparison of in-air and in-saline focimeter measurement of the back vertex power of spherical soft contact lenses

机译:空气中和盐度聚焦计测量球形软性隐形眼镜后顶焦度的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare the repeatability and validity of measurements of the back vertex power (BVP) of spherical soft contact lenses made in-air using the method specified in the International Standard (ISO 18369-3:2006) with the corresponding values when BVP was calculated from measurements made using a wet cell and focimeter method that is not approved by this Standard. Methods: The BVP of 20 hydrogel and 20 silicone hydrogel lenses, with labelled powers ranging from +8.00 to -12.00 D, were measured with a focimeter by two operators on two occasions in-air in accordance with the relevant International Standard. Equivalent sets of measurements were made with the lenses immersed in-saline within a wet cell and their BVPs in-air were calculated. The validity of each method was assessed by comparing their results with an instrument that used the Hartmann method. Results: The reliability results were generally a little better for the in-saline measurements than for the in-air measurements, although all reliability data demonstrated absolute values of mean errors (inter-operator and inter-session) that were <0.05D for hydrogel lenses and <0.07D for silicone hydrogel lenses. The in-air 95% confidence intervals were <0.45D and <0.40D for hydrogel and silicone hydrogel lenses, respectively and in-saline <0.39 and <0.31D for hydrogel and silicone hydrogel lenses, respectively. The validity data revealed a relationship between measurement error and BVP for the in-air data (the focimeter overestimates the power of high plus and high minus lenses compared with the Hartmann instrument) and possibly a more complex relationship for the in-saline data. The 95% limits of agreement indicate better agreement for the in-saline validity data (-0.55 to +0.48D for hydrogel lenses and -0.42 to +0.54D for silicone hydrogel lenses) than those obtained in-air (-0.64 to +0.68D for hydrogel lenses and -0.57 to +0.44D for silicone hydrogel lenses). Conclusions: Using equipment readily available in a clinical setting, the wet cell method of measurement of the BVP of spherical soft contact lenses has been shown to provide results for reliability and validity that were at least as good as those obtained with the in-air method approved by the International Standard.
机译:目的:比较采用国际标准(ISO 18369-3:2006)规定的方法在空中制造的球形软性隐形眼镜的后顶屈光力(BVP)的可重复性和有效性,以及当BVP为由使用本标准未批准的湿盒和聚焦计方法进行的测量计算得出。方法:根据相关国际标准,由两名操作员在空中两次用聚焦计测量20颗水凝胶和20颗有机硅水凝胶镜片的BVP,其标度范围为+8.00至-12.00D。将镜片浸入盐水中,进行等效测量,并计算其空气中的BVP。通过将其结果与使用Hartmann方法的仪器进行比较来评估每种方法的有效性。结果:尽管所有可靠性数据均显示水凝胶的平均误差(操作者之间和会话间)的绝对值均<0.05D,但盐水中测量的可靠性结果通常比空中测量要好一些镜片,<0.07D(硅酮水凝胶镜片)。空气中95%置信区间对于水凝胶和有机硅水凝胶镜片分别为<0.45D和<0.40D,对于水凝胶和有机硅水凝胶镜片,盐度分别为<0.39和<0.31D。有效性数据揭示了空中数据的测量误差与BVP之间的关系(与Hartmann仪器相比,焦度计高估了高正负镜片的屈光度),而盐度数据的关系可能更为复杂。 95%的一致极限表明,与在空中获得的数据(-0.64至+0.68)相比,盐内有效性数据(对于水凝胶镜片为-0.55至+ 0.48D,对于有机硅水凝胶镜片为-0.42至+ 0.54D)具有更好的一致性。水凝胶镜片为D,硅胶水凝胶镜片为-0.57至+ 0.44D。结论:使用临床上容易获得的设备,湿球法测量球形软性隐形眼镜的BVP已显示出至少与通过空中方法获得的信度和效度相同。由国际标准批准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号