...
首页> 外文期刊>Operative dentistry >Comparison of two at-home whitening products of similar peroxide concentration and different delivery methods.
【24h】

Comparison of two at-home whitening products of similar peroxide concentration and different delivery methods.

机译:比较过氧化氢浓度和输送方式不同的两种家用美白产品。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE : This study compared the whitening efficacy, side effects, and patients' preferences/perceptions of two whitening systems of similar peroxide concentration but different formulation and delivery methods. METHODS : The tooth color change of 24 participants was measured using a shade guide (BSG) and a spectrophotometer (ES). Color difference was calculated: ΔE* = [(ΔL*)(2) + (Δa*)(2) + (Δb*)(2)](1/2). One whitening treatment was randomly applied to the right or left maxillary anterior teeth and the other was applied to the contralateral teeth, at-home with 35% carbamide peroxide in a tray (TW) or with 14% hydrogen peroxide in strips (WS). The tooth color was evaluated at baseline, 15 and 30 days (15 days postwhitening). Participants rated their tooth and soft tissue sensitivity (1-10 scale) and completed a questionnaire on their preferences. Results were analyzed by repeated measurement regression analysis/Tukey and Mann-Whitney (p<0.05). RESULTS : At 15 days, the teeth treated with TW and WS presented ΔE* = 7 and 6, respectively (ΔBSG=3 for both), and at 30 days, they presented ΔE* = 7.5 and 6.5, respectively (ΔBSG=3 for both). There was no significant difference in tooth and soft tissue sensitivity between treatments. No participant reported tooth and gingival sensitivity at the postwhitening appointment. Of the participants, 83% preferred the TW over WS. CONCLUSION : Both ΔE* and ΔBSG showed no significant difference in tooth color change between TW and SW at either time point. By the end of the study no participants reported tooth and gingival sensitivity. Participants preferred TW over SW.
机译:目的:本研究比较了两种过氧化物浓度相似但配方和递送方法不同的美白系统的美白功效,副作用以及患者的喜好/感知。方法:使用阴影引导器(BSG)和分光光度计(ES)测量24名参与者的牙齿颜色变化。计算出色差:ΔE* = [(ΔL*)(2)+(Δa*)(2)+(Δb*)(2)](1/2)。一种增白治疗被随机应用于右或左上颌前牙,另一种被应用于对侧牙齿,在家中用托盘中的35%过氧化脲(TW)或在条中使用14%的过氧化氢(WS)。在基线,15天和30天(美白后15天)评估牙齿颜色。参与者对牙齿和软组织的敏感性进行了评分(1-10级),并完成了关于其偏好的问卷调查。结果通过重复测量回归分析/ Tukey和Mann-Whitney(p <0.05)进行分析。结果:在第15天,用TW和WS处理的牙齿分别表现为ΔE* = 7和6(两者均为ΔBSG= 3),在30天时,分别呈现ΔE* = 7.5和6.5(ΔBSG= 3都)。治疗之间牙齿和软组织敏感性没有显着差异。在美白后的约会中,没有参与者报告牙齿和牙龈敏感性。在参与者中,有83%的人更喜欢TW,而不是WS。结论:在任一时间点,TW和SW之间的ΔE*和ΔBSG均未显示牙齿颜色变化的显着差异。到研究结束时,没有参与者报告牙齿和牙龈敏感性。与SW相比,参与者更喜欢TW。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号