...
首页> 外文期刊>Operations Research: The Journal of the Operations Research Society of America >Flexible server allocation and customer routing policies for two parallel queues when service rates are not additive
【24h】

Flexible server allocation and customer routing policies for two parallel queues when service rates are not additive

机译:当服务费率不相加时,针对两个并行队列的灵活服务器分配和客户路由策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We consider the question of how routing and allocation can be coordinated to meet the challenge of demand variability in a parallel queueing system serving two types of customers. A decision maker decides whether to keep customers at the station at which they arrived or to reroute them to the other station. At the same time, the decision maker has two servers and must decide where to allocate their effort. We analyze this joint decision-making scenario with both routing and station-dependent holding costs, but add an important twist. We allow the combined service rate (when the servers work at the same station) to be superadditive or subadditive. This captures positive or negative externalities that arise during collaboration. We seek an optimal control policy under the discounted or long-run average cost criteria. Our results show that in the superadditive case jobs should never be routed away from the lower-cost queue. When jobs are rerouted from the higher-cost queue to the low-cost queue the optimal control is monotone in the respective queue lengths. Moreover, we show that the optimal allocation is a nonidling priority rule based on the holding costs. In the subadditive case we find that the optimal policy need not exhibit such a simple structure. In fact, the optimal allocation need not prioritize one station (it may split the servers), and the optimal routing need not be monotone in the number of customers in each queue. We characterize the optimal policy for a few canonical cases and discuss why intuitive policies need not be optimal in the general case. An extensive numerical study examines the benefit of dynamically controlling both routing and resource allocation; we discuss when using one of the two levers-dynamic routing and dynamic allocation-is sufficient and when using both controls is warranted.
机译:我们考虑一个问题,即如何在为两种类型的客户服务的并行排队系统中协调路由和分配以应对需求可变性的挑战。决策者决定是将客户留在他们到达的站点还是将他们重新路由到另一个站点。同时,决策者有两台服务器,必须决定将精力分配到哪里。我们分析了这种联合决策方案,包括路线和与车站有关的持有成本,但增加了一个重要的方面。我们允许组合的服务速率(当服务器在同一站点上工作时)是超加性的或次加性的。这捕获了协作期间出现的正面或负面外部性。我们在折现或长期平均成本标准下寻求最佳控制策略。我们的结果表明,在超级加性情况下,不应将作业从低成本队列中移开。当作业从较高成本的队列重新路由到低成本队列时,最佳控制在各个队列长度中是单调的。此外,我们表明最优分配是基于持有成本的非闲置优先级规则。在亚可加的情况下,我们发现最优策略不必表现出如此简单的结构。实际上,最佳分配不需要对一个站进行优先级划分(它可以拆分服务器),并且最佳路由不必在每个队列中的客户数量上都是单调的。我们描述了一些典型案例的最优策略,并讨论了为什么在一般情况下直观策略无需最优。广泛的数值研究探讨了动态控制路由和资源分配的好处。我们讨论了何时使用动态路由和动态分配这两个杠杆之一就足够了,以及何时需要同时使用两个控件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号