...
首页> 外文期刊>Operations Research: The Journal of the Operations Research Society of America >Sourcing flexibility, spot trading, and procurement contract structure
【24h】

Sourcing flexibility, spot trading, and procurement contract structure

机译:采购灵活性,现货交易和采购合同结构

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We analyze the structure and pricing of option contracts for an industrial good in the presence of spot trading. We combine the analysis of spot trading and buyers' disparate private valuations for different suppliers' products, and we jointly endogenize the determination of three major dimensions in contract design: (i) sales contracts versus options contracts, (ii) flat-price versus volume-dependent contracts, and (iii) volume discounts versus volume premia. We build a model in which a supplier of an industrial good transacts with a manufacturer who uses the supplier's product to produce an end good with an uncertain demand. We show that, consistent with industry observations, volume-dependent optimal sales contracts always demonstrate volume discounts (i.e., involve concave pricing). However, options are more complex agreements, and optimal option contracts can involve both volume discounts and volume premia. Three major contract structures commonly emerge in optimality. First, if the seller has a high discount rate relative to the buyer and the seller's production costs or the production capacity is low, the optimal contracts tend to be flat-price sales contracts. Second, when the seller has a relatively high discount rate compared to the buyer but production costs or production capacity are high, the optimal contracts are sales contracts with volume discounts. Third, if the buyer's discount rate is high relative to the seller's, then the optimal contracts tend to be volume-dependent options contracts and can involve both volume discounts and volume premia. However, when the seller's production capacity is sufficiently low, it is possible to observe flat-price option contracts. Furthermore, we provide links between production and spot market characteristics, contract design, and efficiency.
机译:我们分析了存在现货交易的工业产品期权合约的结构和价格。我们将现货交易的分析与买方对不同供应商产品的不同私人估值的分析相结合,并共同内化了合同设计中三个主要方面的确定:(i)销售合同与期权合同,(ii)固定价格与数量依赖合同,以及(iii)数量折扣与数量溢价。我们建立了一个模型,在该模型中,工业产品的供应商与制造商进行交易,而制造商使用供应商的产品生产需求不确定的最终产品。我们证明,根据行业观察,与数量有关的最佳销售合同始终会显示数量折扣(即涉及隐性定价)。但是,期权是更为复杂的协议,最优期权合同可能涉及批量折扣和批量溢价。最优性通常会出现三个主要的合同结构。首先,如果卖方相对于买方具有较高的折现率,并且卖方的生产成本或生产能力较低,则最佳合同往往是固定价格的销售合同。第二,当卖方的折价率高于买方,但生产成本或生产能力较高时,最优合同是具有批量折扣的销售合同。第三,如果买方的折扣率相对于卖方的折扣率高,则最优合同往往是与数量有关的期权合同,并且可能涉及批量折扣和批量溢价。但是,当卖方的生产能力足够低时,就有可能遵守固定价格期权合约。此外,我们提供生产和现货市场特征,合同设计和效率之间的联系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号