A sensitometric comparison of Kodak Ektavision and Fuji Super HR-S panoramic radiographic films.

摘要

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the combination of Ektavision film and Ektavision intensifying screen with the combination Super HR-S panoramic radiographic film and HR-4 intensifying screen with respect to sensitometric properties and the visualization of anatomic structures. METHODS: The density response and resolution of both panoramic radiographic film/intensifying screen combinations were evaluated through use of the generated characteristic curves and the modulation transfer function. The diagnostic clarity was evaluated by five oral and maxillofacial radiologists who used a rating scale to evaluate the image clarity of selected anatomic structures. RESULTS: The film speed and radiographic contrast, respectively, were 1.3 and 1.2 times higher for Ektavision than for Super HR-S. The image resolution with Ektavision was similar to that with Super HR-S. Ektavision was perceived to provide clearer images of the selected anatomic details than did Super HR-S. CONCLUSION: With respect to the clarity of anatomic structures, Ektavision film, with its higher speed and higher contrast, proved superior to Super HR-S film.