...
首页> 外文期刊>Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics >Influence of instrument taper on the resistance to fracture of endodontically treated roots.
【24h】

Influence of instrument taper on the resistance to fracture of endodontically treated roots.

机译:器械锥度对根管治疗牙根抗断裂性的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare the force required to fracture uninstrumented and instrumented canines and to investigate the root-reinforcing capability of AH Plus sealer. STUDY DESIGN: In groups 1-3 (n = 24) canals were instrumented with either GT files, FlexMaster, or stainless steel hand instruments. Twelve teeth from each group were obturated with lateral compaction using gutta-percha and AH Plus. Group 4 (n = 12) acted as uninstrumented controls. The force required to fracture the roots was measured. ANOVA, Scheffe, and t test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The intact roots were significantly stronger than all groups with instrumented and unobturated roots (P < .05). Roots enlarged with GT files were significantly weaker (P < .05) than those instrumented with FlexMaster or hand instruments. Between the obturated and unobturated roots there were no significant differences (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The roots were significantly weakened by the preparation with greater taper instruments. An obturation with AH Plus did not increase the fracture resistance.
机译:目的:比较无器械和器械犬的骨折所需的力,并研究AH Plus密封剂的根部加固能力。研究设计:在1-3组(n = 24)中,使用GT锉,FlexMaster或不锈钢手动器械对运河进行了器械测试。使用牙胶和AH Plus将每组的十二颗牙齿进行侧向压实封闭。第4组(n = 12)充当非仪器控制。测量了使根部断裂所需的力。方差分析,Scheffe和t检验用于统计分析。结果:完整的根明显强于所有有根和不阻塞根的组(P <.05)。用GT文件放大的根比用FlexMaster或手动工具的根明显弱(P <.05)。闭根和未闭根之间没有显着差异(P> .05)。结论:用更大的锥度工具制备后根部明显变弱。用AH Plus封闭不会增加抗断裂性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号