Accuracy of digital panoramic images displayed on monitor, glossy paper, and film for assessment of mandibular third molars.

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of 3 modalities of digital panoramic radiographs-monitor-displayed images and printed copies on glossy paper and on blue transparent film-for assessment of position and morphology of mandibular third molars. STUDY DESIGN: 164 third molars were recorded with one of 2 digital panoramic systems (Digora and Orthophos Plus) and assessed by 4 observers on 3 radiographic modalities: monitor display, glossy paper, and transparent film. The assessments were compared with surgeons' findings at the time of the operation ("gold standard"). RESULTS: Overall, the observer variation was larger than the variation between methods. A detailed paired analysis revealed some differences between the modalities for some diagnostic categories, but these were few and inconsistent. CONCLUSION: Printed images from the Kodak 1200 ink-jet printer on glossy paper and blue transparent film may be as accurate as the original monitor-displayed digital panoramic images from the Digora and Orthophos Plus systems for assessment of position and morphology of mandibular third molars.