首页> 外文期刊>Ophthalmology >Effect of optic material on posterior capsule opacification in intraocular lenses with sharp-edge optics: randomized clinical trial.
【24h】

Effect of optic material on posterior capsule opacification in intraocular lenses with sharp-edge optics: randomized clinical trial.

机译:光学材料对具有尖端光学器件的人工晶状体后囊混浊的影响:随机临床试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: Comparison of the intensity of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) between a silicone intraocular lens (IOL) and a hydrophobic acrylic IOL, both of them 3-piece and open-loop and having truncated optics with sharp edges. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, patient- and examiner-masked trial with intrapatient comparison. PARTICIPANTS AND CONTROLS: One hundred six eyes of 53 patients with age-related bilateral cataract. METHODS: Each patient had cataract surgery in both eyes and received a silicone IOL in one eye and a hydrophobic acrylic IOL in the fellow eye. Follow-up examinations were at 1 and 3 years after surgery. The patients were examined at the slit lamp, visual acuity (VA) was assessed, and standardized high-resolution digital retroillumination images of the posterior capsule were taken. The amount of PCO was assessed subjectively at the slit lamp and objectively using automated image analysis software. Data of 56 eyes of 28 patients, who were examined at each follow-up, were analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Posterior capsule opacification intensity at 3 years as measured with automated image analysis. RESULTS: At 1 and 3 years after surgery, PCO did not differ between the silicone (1.6 and 1.9 [image analysis scores, 0-10 scale], respectively) and acrylic IOLs (1.7 and 2.2) (P > 0.24). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in best-corrected VA, rhexis/IOL overlap, capsular folds, and amount of anterior capsule opacification during the follow-up period. In each group, one neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (YAG) laser capsulotomy was performed during the entire study duration. CONCLUSION: Silicone and hydrophobic acrylic are similarly effective in inducing the PCO-inhibiting effect of a rectangular, sharp optic edge. Three years after surgery, the PCO intensity and the YAG rate were low with both IOL models.
机译:目的:比较有机硅人工晶状体(IOL)和疏水性丙烯酸人工晶体(IOL)的后囊混浊(PCO)的强度​​,两者均为3件式和开环式,并具有截短的光学器件和锋利边缘。设计:随机,对照,患者和检查者掩盖的试验,并进行患者内比较。参与者和对照:53例年龄相关的双侧白内障患者的一百零六只眼。方法:每名患者的两只眼睛都进行了白内障手术,一只眼睛接受了硅树脂人工晶体,另一只眼睛接受了疏水性丙烯酸人工晶体。术后1年和3年进行随访检查。在裂隙灯处检查患者,评估视力(VA),并获取后囊的标准化高分辨率数字后照明图像。在裂隙灯处主观评估PCO的量,并使用自动图像分析软件客观地评估PCO的量。分析了28例患者的56眼的数据,这些患者在每次随访中均进行了检查。主要观察指标:3年后囊混浊强度,通过自动图像分析测量。结果:术后1年和3年,有机硅(分别为1.6和1.9 [图像分析得分,0-10级])和丙烯酸类IOL(1.7和2.2)之间的PCO没有差异(P> 0.24)。此外,在随访期间,最佳矫正后的VA,rhexis / IOL重叠,囊膜折叠和前囊混浊量没有显着差异。在整个研究期间,每组进行一次钕:钇铝石榴石(YAG)激光囊切开术。结论:有机硅和疏水性丙烯酸在诱导矩形,锋利的光学边缘的PCO抑制作用方面同样有效。术后三年,两种IOL模型的PCO强度和YAG率均较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号