...
首页> 外文期刊>Ophthalmology >Effect of cataract surgery on the corneal endothelium: modern phacoemulsification compared with extracapsular cataract surgery.
【24h】

Effect of cataract surgery on the corneal endothelium: modern phacoemulsification compared with extracapsular cataract surgery.

机译:白内障手术对角膜内皮的影响:与囊外白内障手术相比,现代超声乳化术。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: To investigate whether modern phacoemulsification surgery results in more damage to the corneal endothelium than extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE), and to examine which preoperative, operative, and postoperative factors influence the effect of cataract surgery on the endothelium. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred patients 40 years or older were randomized into 2 groups (ECCE, 249; phacoemulsification, 251). METHODS: Central corneal endothelial cell counts, coefficient of variation of cell size, and hexagonality were assessed before surgery and up to 1 year postoperatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Endothelial cell count. RESULTS: Four hundred thirty-three patients completed the trial. The initial preoperative mean cell count for the entire sample was 2481 (standard error [SE]: 18.6), reduced at 1 year postoperatively to 2239 (SE: 23.5). An average 10% reduction in cell count was recorded by 1 year postoperatively. There was no such change in hexagonality or inthe coefficient of variation. There was no significant difference in overall percentage cell loss between the 2 treatment groups. Factors associated with excessive cell loss (> or =15% by 1 year) were a hard cataract (odds ratio [OR]: 2.1, 95% confidence limits: 1.1-4.1; P = 0.036), age (OR: 1.04, P = 0.005), and capsule or vitreous loss at surgery (OR: 2.38, P = 0.106). Phacoemulsification carried a significantly higher risk (OR: 3.7, P = 0.045) of severe cell loss in the 45 patients with hard cataracts relative to ECCE (52.6% vs. 23.1%; chi-square test, P = 0.041), with both procedures achieving similar postoperative visual acuity outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference in overall corneal endothelial cell loss was found between these 2 operative techniques. The increased risk of severe cell loss with phacoemulsification in patients with hard cataracts suggests that phacoemulsification may not be the optimal procedure in these cases, and that ECCE should be preferred.
机译:目的:调查现代超声乳化手术是否比白内障白内障摘除术(ECCE)对角膜内皮造成更大损害,并检查哪些术前,术中和术后因素会影响白内障手术对内皮的影响。设计:随机对照试验。参与者:将500名40岁或40岁以上的患者随机分为两组(ECCE,249;超声乳化,251)。方法:在手术前及术后一年内评估中央角膜内皮细胞计数,细胞大小变异系数和六角形。主要观察指标:内皮细胞计数。结果:433名患者完成了该试验。整个样本的术前平均细胞计数为2481(标准误[SE]:18.6),术后1年降至2239(SE:23.5)。术后1年记录的细胞计数平均减少10%。六角形或变异系数没有这种变化。在两个治疗组之间,总细胞损失百分比没有显着差异。与过度细胞丢失(>或= 15%的1年)相关的因素是硬性白内障(赔率[OR]:2.1,95%置信度限制:1.1-4.1; P = 0.036),年龄(OR:1.04,P = 0.005),并且手术时囊膜或玻璃体丢失(OR:2.38,P = 0.106)。相对于ECCE,超声乳化术在45例硬性白内障患者中发生严重细胞丢失的风险显着更高(OR:3.7,P = 0.045)(52.6%vs. 23.1%;卡方检验,P = 0.041)。达到类似的术后视力结果。结论:这两种手术技术在总的角膜内皮细胞损失上没有显着差异。患有白内障的硬性白内障患者使用超声乳化术导致严重细胞丢失的风险增加,这表明在这些情况下超声乳化术可能不是最佳方法,因此应首选ECCE。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号