...
首页> 外文期刊>Ophthalmology >Anwar versus melles deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for keratoconus: A prospective randomized clinical trial
【24h】

Anwar versus melles deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for keratoconus: A prospective randomized clinical trial

机译:Anwar vs Melles深层前角膜角膜移植术治疗圆锥角膜:一项前瞻性随机临床试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of 2 techniques (Anwar vs. Melles) of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) in patients with keratoconus. Design: Randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Participants: Fifty-seven eyes of 57 patients 20 to 35 years of age were enrolled. Methods: Patients with clinical diagnosis of keratoconus who were contact lens intolerant and whose corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was less than 20/80 were enrolled. Eligible eyes were allocated randomly into 2 groups: the Anwar technique (23 eyes) or the Melles technique (25 eyes). Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measure was CDVA. Secondary outcomes were spherical equivalent, contrast sensitivity, corneal aberrations, corneal biomechanical properties, endothelial cell count, and central corneal thickness. All outcomes were compared 15 months after surgery. Results: The CDVA was 0.17??0.09 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) units and 0.18??0.11 logMAR units in the Anwar and Melles groups, respectively (P = 0.803). Spherical equivalent was -1.82??2.7 diopters (D) and -2.69??3.94 D in the Anwar and Melles groups, respectively (P = 0.155). Overall, the difference in photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity function between the 2 groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between 2 groups in total and higher-order aberrations up to the fifth order (P>0.05 for all parameters). Corneal hysteresis was not significantly different between the 2 groups (9.9??0.8 vs. 9.9??0.6; P = 0.606). The corneal resistance factor was 10.02??0.8 and 10.13??0.76 (P = 0.509). There was no significant difference in percentage of endothelial cell loss between the 2 groups (1??2% vs. 1??3% in the Anwar and Melles groups, respectively; P = 0.869). Mean central corneal thickness was 525.56??47.87 ??m versus 504.64??54.20 ??m in the Anwar and Melles groups, respectively (P = 0.155). Conclusions: The Anwar and Melles techniques of DALK have comparable visual acuity and refractive outcomes, aberrometric profiles, biomechanical properties, corneal thicknesses, and endothelial cell densities. However, patients who underwent the Anwar technique showed better contrast sensitivity. Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article. ? 2013 American Academy of Ophthalmology.
机译:目的:比较圆锥角膜患者深前板层角膜移植术(DALK)的两种技术(Anwar vs. Melles)的结果。设计:随机,双盲临床试验。参与者:纳入57例20至35岁患者的57眼。方法:纳入临床诊断为圆锥角膜的隐形眼镜不耐受且矫正远视力(CDVA)小于20/80的患者。将符合条件的眼睛随机分为2组:Anwar技术(23眼)或Melles技术(25眼)。主要结果指标:主要结果指标是CDVA。次要结果是等效球镜,对比敏感度,角膜像差,角膜生物力学特性,内皮细胞计数和角膜中央厚度。术后15个月比较所有结局。结果:Anwar和Melles组的CDVA分别是最小分辨角(logMAR)单位的0.17≤0.09对数和Anwar和Melles组中的0.18≤0.11logMAR的对数(P = 0.803)。在Anwar和Melles组中,球面当量分别为-1.82?2.7屈光度(D)和-2.69?3.94 D(P = 0.155)。总体而言,两组之间在视觉和中视对比敏感度功能上的差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05)。两组之间的总像差和高阶像差在五阶之前均无显着差异(所有参数的P> 0.05)。两组之间的角膜滞后没有显着差异(9.9 ?? 0.8 vs. 9.9 ?? 0.6; P = 0.606)。角膜阻力因子为10.02≤0.8和10.13≤0.76(P = 0.509)。两组之间的内皮细胞损失百分比没有显着差异(Anwar和Melles组分别为1%2%和1%3%; P = 0.869)。平均角膜中央厚度为525.56?47.87?m,而Anwar和Melles组分别为504.64?54.20?m(P = 0.155)。结论:DALK的Anwar和Melles技术具有可比的视力和屈光结果,像差图,生物力学特性,角膜厚度和内皮细胞密度。但是,接受Anwar技术的患者显示出更好的对比敏感度。财务披露:作者对本文讨论的任何材料均没有所有权或商业利益。 ? 2013美国眼科学院。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号