Immunologic graft rejection in descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty for endothelial disease

摘要

Objective: To evaluate and compare the cumulative incidence and risk factors for first-episode immunologic graft rejection in Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and to identify potential risk factors for rejection. Design: Retrospective chart review. Participants: All patients who underwent PK or DSAEK for endothelial disease at the Department of Ophthalmology, North Shore LIJ, between January 2004 and June 2010. Methods: One hundred sixty-nine PK cases and 122 DSAEK cases were reviewed. All patients had a minimum of 3 months of follow-up, with median follow-up of 36 months in the PK group and 29 months in the DSAEK group. Main Outcome Measures: Cumulative incidence of first-episode immunologic graft rejection in PK and DSAEK cohorts. Risk factors for graft rejection were reviewed. Results: Cumulative incidence of rejection was not significantly different between the DSAEK and PK cohorts (P<0.1324). However, among patients without glaucoma, the risk of rejection in PK was higher than that in DSAEK (hazard ratio [HR], 5.56). Prior incisional glaucoma surgery imparted a 3.15 times greater risk of rejection regardless of transplant type. Phakic patients were more likely to experience rejection than patients with a posterior chamber intraocular lens (HR, 3.23; P<0.0266), but not more likely than those with an anterior chamber intraocular lens or who were aphakic. Graft failure occurred within 6 months in 31% of PK rejections and none of the DSAEK rejections. Conclusions: Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and PK did not show a statistically significant difference in the incidence of rejection; however, among nonglaucomatous eyes, there were significantly fewer rejections in those that underwent DSAEK. Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.