首页> 外文期刊>Ophthalmic Surgery and Lasers >Threshold determinations for selective retinal pigment epithelium damage with repetitive pulsed microsecond laser systems in rabbits.
【24h】

Threshold determinations for selective retinal pigment epithelium damage with repetitive pulsed microsecond laser systems in rabbits.

机译:重复脉冲微秒激光系统对兔选择性视网膜色素上皮细胞损伤的阈值测定。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In both clinical and animal studies, it has been shown that repetitive short laser pulses can cause selective retinal pigment epithelium damage (RPE) with sparing of photoreceptors. Our purpose was to determine the ophthalmoscopic and angiographic damage thresholds as a function of pulse durations by using different pulsed laser systems to optimize treatment modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Chinchilla-breed rabbits were narcotized and placed in a special holding system. Laser lesions were applied using a commercial laser slit lamp, contact lens, and irradiation with a frequency-doubled Nd:YLF laser (wave-length: 527 nm; repetition rate: 500 Hz; number of pulses: 100; pulse duration: 5 micros, 1.7 micros, 200 ns) and an argon-ion laser (514 nm, 500 Hz, 100 pulses, 5 micros and 200 ms). In all eyes, spots with different energies were placed into the regio macularis with a diameter of 102 microm (tophat profile). After treatment, fundus photography and fluorescein angiography were performed and radiant exposure for ED50 damage determined. Speckle measurements at the fiber tips were performed to determine intensity peaks in the beam profile. RESULTS: Using the Nd:YLF laser system, the ophthalmoscopic ED50 threshold energies were 25.4 microJ (5 micros), 32 microJ (1.7 micros), and 30 microJ (200 ns). The angiographic ED50 thresholds were 13.4 microJ (5 micros), 9.2 microJ (1.7 micros), and 6.7 microJ (200 ns). With the argon laser, the angiographic threshold for 5 micros pulses was 5.5 microJ. The ophthalmoscopic threshold could not be determined because of a lack of power; however, it was > 12 microJ. For 200 ms, the ED50 radiant exposures were 20.4 mW ophthalmoscopically and 19.2 mW angiographically. Speckle factors were found to be 1.225 for the Nd:YLF and 3.180 for the argon laser. Thus, the maximal ED50 -threshold radiant exposures for the Nd:YLF were calculated to be 362 mJ/cM2 (5 micros), 478 mJ/cm2 (1.7 micros), and 438 mJ/cm2 (200 ns) ophthalmoscopically. Angiographically, the thresholds were 189 mJ/cm2 (5 micros), 143 mJ/cm2 (1.7 micros), and 97 mJ/cm2 (200 ns). For the argon laser, the maximal ED50 radiant exposure threshold was 170 mJ/cm2 angiographically. CONCLUSION: The gap between the angiographic and the ophthalmoscopic thresholds for the 200 ns regime (4.5 times above angiographic ED50) was wider than for the 1.7 micros regime (3.3 times above the angiographic ED50). This would suggest the appropriate treatment would be 200 ns pulses. However, histologies have yet to prove that nonvisible mechanical effects increase with shorter pulse durations and could reduce the "therapeutic window." When comparing the thresholds with 5 micros pulses from the argon and Nd:YLF laser, it demonstrates that intensity modulations in the beam profile must be considered.
机译:背景与目的:在临床和动物研究中,均已表明重复的短激光脉冲可导致选择性视网膜色素上皮损伤(RPE),并保留少量感光细胞。我们的目的是通过使用不同的脉冲激光系统来优化治疗方式,以确定作为脉冲持续时间函数的检眼镜和血管造影损伤阈值。材料与方法:将龙猫繁殖的兔子麻醉并置于特殊的保持系统中。使用商用激光裂隙灯,隐形眼镜和倍频Nd:YLF激光(波长:527 nm;重复频率:500 Hz;脉冲数:100;脉冲持续时间:5微米)照射激光损伤,1.7微米,200 ns)和氩离子激光器(514 nm,500 Hz,100脉冲,5微米和200 ms)。在所有眼睛中,将具有不同能量的斑点置于直径为102微米(高帽轮廓)的黄斑区。治疗后,进行眼底照相和荧光素血管造影,并确定ED50损伤的辐射暴露。在光纤尖端进行散斑测量以确定光束轮廓中的强度峰值。结果:使用Nd:YLF激光系统,检眼镜的ED50阈值能量为25.4 microJ(5 micros),32 microJ(1.7 micros)和30 microJ(200 ns)。血管造影ED50阈值为13.4 microJ(5 micros),9.2 microJ(1.7 micros)和6.7 microJ(200 ns)。使用氩激光,5微脉冲的血管造影阈值为5.5 microJ。由于缺乏动力,无法确定检眼镜的阈值;但是,它大于12 microJ。在200毫秒内,眼底镜检查的ED50辐射暴露为20.4 mW,血管造影的辐射暴露为19.2 mW。 Nd:YLF的散斑因子为1.225,而氩激光的散斑因子为3.180。因此,在眼底镜检查下,Nd:YLF的最大ED50阈值辐射暴露经计算为362 mJ / cM2(5微米),478 mJ / cm2(1.7微米)和438 mJ / cm2(200 ns)。血管造影术的阈值为189 mJ / cm2(5微米),143 mJ / cm2(1.7微米)和97 mJ / cm2(200 ns)。对于氩激光,血管造影的最大ED50辐射暴露阈值为170 mJ / cm2。结论:200 ns方案(比血管造影ED50高4.5倍)的血管造影和检眼镜阈值之间的差距比1.7 micros方案(比血管造影ED50高3.3倍)更宽。这表明适当的处理将是200 ns脉冲。但是,组织学尚未证明不可见的机械作用会随着较短的脉冲持续时间而增加,并可能减小“治疗窗”。将阈值与来自氩气和Nd:YLF激光器的5微秒脉冲进行比较时,表明必须考虑光束轮廓中的强度调制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号