...
首页> 外文期刊>Optometry and vision science: official publication of the American Academy of Optometry >Comparing the optical properties of soft contact lenses on and off the eye
【24h】

Comparing the optical properties of soft contact lenses on and off the eye

机译:比较眼睛上和眼睛外的软性隐形眼镜的光学特性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: The purpose of the current study was to examine the on-and off-eye optical performance of two types of soft contact lenses (hydrogel and silicone hydrogel). METHODS: The monochromatic aberrations (λ = 850 nm) of contact lenses were measured on-eye using a clinical Shack-Hartmann ocular aberrometer. In addition, we used an off-eye single-pass contact lens aberrometer (λ = 540 nm) in which the soft contact lens was placed within a wet cell. Comparison of the lower and higher order aberrations measured with these two methods required compensation for different wavelengths and knowledge of the refractive index of the contact lens materials. RESULTS: The measured on-eye sphere and spherical aberration values were generally similar to those measured off-eye and those specified by the lens manufacturers for both types of soft contact lenses. However, there were notable differences, especially for high plus-powered lenses, which typically exhibited lower sphere power on the eye than expected from the lens specifications and from the off-eye measured powers, both of which were almost identical. Longitudinal spherical aberration varied with lens power in the hydrogel lenses, as expected from geometric optics theory. Longitudinal spherical aberration measurements on-and off-eye, however, deviated significantly from that expected of a thin lens with spherical surfaces due to surface asphericities. The difference between on-and off-eye optics can be modeled as a tear lens or as relative lens thickness changes caused by lens flexure. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study reveal that the major difference between the on-eye lens optics and the manufacturers' specifications is not due to lens errors but due to eye-lens interactions, which could be either lens flexure or a tear lens forming behind the soft contact lens.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是检查两种类型的软性隐形眼镜(水凝胶和有机硅水凝胶)的眼内和眼外光学性能。方法:使用临床Shack-Hartmann眼像差计在眼睛上测量隐形眼镜的单色像差(λ= 850 nm)。此外,我们使用了将软性隐形眼镜放在湿室内的离眼单次隐形眼镜像差仪(λ= 540 nm)。用这两种方法测量的低阶和高阶像差的比较需要补偿不同的波长和隐形眼镜材料的折射率。结果:所测得的眼球和球面像差值通常与在眼外测得的值以及两种软性隐形眼镜的镜片制造商指定的值相似。但是,存在显着差异,特别是对于高倍数的镜片,通常在眼睛上的球面屈光力要比镜片规格和离眼后测量的屈光力低,两者几乎是相同的。如几何光学理论所预期的那样,水凝胶镜片的纵向球差随镜片性能而变化。然而,由于表面的非球面性,在眼内和眼外的纵向球差测量值与具有球形表面的薄透镜的预期值明显不同。可以将眼上和眼外光学器件之间的差异建模为泪液透镜,也可以将其建模为由透镜弯曲引起的相对透镜厚度变化。结论:当前的研究结果表明,在眼镜片光学器件和制造商的规格之间的主要差异不是由于镜片误差,而是由于镜片之间的相互作用,这可能是镜片弯曲或撕裂镜片形成在软性隐形眼镜后面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号