首页> 外文期刊>Oncology letters >Neoadjuvant chemoradiation versus perioperative chemotherapy followed by surgery in resectable adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction: A retrospective single center analysis
【24h】

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation versus perioperative chemotherapy followed by surgery in resectable adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction: A retrospective single center analysis

机译:食管胃交界处可切除腺癌的新辅助放化疗与围手术期化疗的对比:回顾性单中心分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The current study presents a retrospective comparison, performed at a single academic center, of preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) and perioperative chemotherapy (CT) in addition to surgery in locally advanced but resectable adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). A total of 29 consecutive patients with locally advanced AEGs were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment consisted of preoperative CRT (mean dose, 45.0 Gy) plus two cycles of CT with cisplatin and 5-FU or perioperative CT with epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine (three cycles preoperatively and postoperatively). Within four to six weeks following preoperative treatment, surgical therapy was performed. Median overall survival was 21.0 months in the perioperative CT group versus 41.7 months in the CRT group [P=0.36; hazard ratio (HR), 1.50; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.58-3.84]. Three-year survival rates were 55 and 38%, respectively, in favor of the CRT group, and progression-free survival was 20.0 months in the CT group compared with 24.1 months in the CRT group (P=0.71; HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.46-3.05). The total number of major surgical complications was almost equal in the two groups. Margin-free resections were achieved in all patients of the CRT group, but only 76.9% of the CT group (P=0.05). In addition, significantly higher R0 resection rates and an increased number of pathological complete remissions were demonstrated in the CRT group compared with those of the CT group. These results appear to indicate a trend for improved progression-free and overall survival for the CRT group. As postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were similar in the two groups, the results support the use of CRT for patients with advanced AEG tumors.
机译:本研究提供了在单个学术中心对术前放化疗(CRT)和围手术期化疗(CT)以及在局部晚期但可切除的食管胃交界处腺癌(AEG)中进行手术的回顾性比较。回顾性分析了连续29例局部晚期AEG的患者。治疗包括术前CRT(平均剂量,45.0 Gy)加上两个周期的顺铂和5-FU CT扫描或围手术期表柔比星,顺铂和卡培他滨CT(术前和术后三个周期)。术前治疗后四到六周内,进行了外科治疗。 CT围手术期中位总生存期为21.0个月,而CRT组为41.7个月[P = 0.36;危险比(HR)为1.50; 95%置信区间(CI),0.58-3.84]。 CRT组的三年生存率分别为55%和38%,CT组的无进展生存期为20.0个月,而CRT组为24.1个月(P = 0.71; HR,1.19; 95) %CI,0.46-3.05)。两组的主要手术并发症总数几乎相等。 CRT组的所有患者均实现了无边缘切除,但仅占CT组的76.9%(P = 0.05)。此外,与CT组相比,CRT组的R0切除率显着提高,病理完全缓解的数量增加。这些结果似乎表明,CRT组的无进展生存率和总体生存率都有改善的趋势。由于两组的术后发病率和死亡率相似,因此该结果支持对患有晚期AEG肿瘤的患者使用CRT。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号