Oil IT Journal interview—Garrett Leahy

摘要

Last time we talked it wasn 't clear if RMS was really 'doing'seismic interpretation... Yes, the seismic workstation market does seem saturated. But the other tools still leverage a pencil and paper paradigm. Our new technology lets you model on the fly. You just put in a few control points and the guided interpretation tool does the rest, producing a set of 3D geological surfaces. But 'modeling while interpreting' is not entirely new... No. But what RMS adds is a simultaneous quantification of uncertainties in the interpretation. The uncertainty 'brush' produces multiple realizations and a fully risked structural picture and rock volumes. How did this go down at the AAPG. The American market is perhaps not so receptive to 'uncertainty?'