首页> 外文期刊>Oil and Gas Reporter >Pollution: Standing to Sue; Subsequent Purchasers
【24h】

Pollution: Standing to Sue; Subsequent Purchasers

机译:污染:诉讼原告;后续购买者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. purchases property located in Lafayette Parish, Louisiana in 1988. The property was previously leased to Union Pipe, Inc., which operated a pipe yard where used oilfield pipe was cleaned and stored. In 2008, the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality notifies Eagle Pipe that the property is contaminated with technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive materials (TENORM), and orders Eagle Pipe to remediate the property. In July 2008 Eagle Pipe files suit against the former landowners, oil companies that had sold used equipment to Union Pipe, and trucking companies that had delivered the equipment to the property. Eagle Pipe alleges that during the cleaning process, radioactive scale fell from the tubing and contaminated the soil of the pipe yard. The oil company and trucking defendants file exceptions of no right of action and improper venue, and move to transfer on the basis of forum non conveniens. The trial court grants the peremptory exception of no right of action, finding that because Eagle Pipe acquired the property after the contamination had stopped, the claim is a personal right that belongs to the former owners (as opposed to a real right that follows the land), and the claim was not expressly assigned to Eagle Pipe. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal, 47 So.3d 428, 174 0.&G.R. 19 (LaApp. 2010) originally affirms, but reverses on rehearing, and defendants apply to the Louisiana Supreme Court for writs of review.
机译:Eagle Pipe and Supply,Inc.于1988年购买了位于路易斯安那州拉斐特教区的物业。该物业先前已租给Union Pipe,Inc.,该公司经营着一个管道场,用于清洁和储存用过的油田管道。 2008年,路易斯安那州环境质量部通知Eagle Pipe该物业受到技术增强的天然放射性物质(TENORM)的污染,并命令Eagle Pipe对其进行修复。 2008年7月,Eagle Pipe提起诉讼,起诉前土地所有人,将二手设备出售给Union Pipe的石油公司以及将设备运送到该物业的卡车公司。 Eagle Pipe公司称,在清洁过程中,放射性水垢从管道中掉落并污染了管道堆场的土壤。石油公司和货运被告提出了无诉权和地点不当的例外,并根据不便提起诉讼而转移。初审法院授予无诉权的强制性例外,裁定由于鹰派(Eagle Pipe)在污染停止后获得了财产,因此该诉求是属于前所有人的一项个人权利(而不是跟随土地的物权) ),并且该索赔没有明确分配给Eagle Pipe。上诉后,第四巡回上诉法院,第47 So.3d 428,174 0.&G.R.。 19(LaApp。2010)最初是肯定的,但在复审时相反,被告向路易斯安那州最高法院申请复审令。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号