...
首页> 外文期刊>Oikos: A Journal of Ecology >The good, the bad and the Ulva: the density dependent role of macroalgal subsidies in influencing diversity and trophic structure of an estuarine community
【24h】

The good, the bad and the Ulva: the density dependent role of macroalgal subsidies in influencing diversity and trophic structure of an estuarine community

机译:好,坏和Ulva:大型藻类补贴对河口群落多样性和营养结构的密度依赖性作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Worldwide, ecological subsidies enhance ecosystem productivity and therefore trophic support for greater biodiversity of taxa. While studies in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems demonstrate that the magnitude of subsidies into ecosystems differs widely, the thresholds where subsidies may switch from exerting positive to negative effects are poorly understood. In estuaries, eutrophication promotes drift macroalgae that deposit on the benthos, cover intertidal flats for months and serve as pressed resource subsidies for benthic consumers. We hypothesized there would be a critical threshold of macroalgal biomass where ecosystem-level effects would turn from positive to negative. We used manipulative field experiments varying macroalgal mat thickness (0.5, 1.5 and 4 cm) over eight weeks and quantified effects on macrofauna on a lagoon mudflat in California. We documented that plots with mat depths of 0.5 and 1.5 cm had higher diversity by supporting both surface feeding and burrowing detritivores. Non-metric multidimensional scaling showed that the benthic community diverged with mat depth over the course of the experiment. After eight weeks, surface deposit feeders were associated mainly with 0.5 cm macroalgal subsidies, whereas subsurface deposit feeding capitellids were closely linked with 4 cm mats. Depth profiles of pore water sulfide concentration collected from 4 cm mats were 7622 +/- 5294 mu M, mean +/- SE, (mean of means across depth profiles), whereas 0.5 cm treatments resulted in sulfide concentrations that were 0.25% of the 4 cm treatments. This suggests that the mechanism of negative effects for elevated macroalgal subsidies was development of anoxic conditions promoting sulfide accumulation. Thus, our study was the first to find a critical threshold, or ecological tipping point, beyond which the effects of anthropogenically enhanced subsidies to estuarine mudflat communities switched from positive to negative and to describe the mechanism by which elevated subsides altered the abiotic environment and likely reduced ecosystem functioning.
机译:在全球范围内,生态补贴提高了生态系统的生产力,因此为更大的生物分类生物多样性提供了营养支持。尽管对陆地和水生生态系统的研究表明,对生态系统的补贴幅度差异很大,但人们对补贴可能从发挥积极作用转变为消极作用的门槛了解甚少。在河口,富营养化促进了沉积在底栖生物上的大型藻类的生长,覆盖了潮间带数月,并为底栖生物的消费者提供了紧迫的资源补贴。我们假设存在一个大型藻类生物量的临界阈值,在该阈值中,生态系统水平的影响将从正变为负。我们使用操纵场实验在八周内改变了大型藻垫的厚度(0.5、1.5和4厘米),并量化了对加利福尼亚泻湖滩涂对大型动物的影响。我们记录到,垫层深度为0.5厘米和1.5厘米的样地通过支持地面觅食和挖洞碎屑而具有更高的多样性。非度量多维标度显示,在整个实验过程中,底栖动物群落随着垫层深度而发散。八周后,表面沉积物喂食器主要与0.5 cm的大型藻类补贴相关,而地下沉积物喂食的钩状with虫则与4 cm垫紧密相连。从4 cm垫子上收集的孔隙水硫化物浓度的深度分布图为7622 +/- 5294μM,平均+/- SE(在整个深度分布图上的平均值),而0.5 cm的处理导致硫化物浓度为总厚度的0.25%。 4厘米的治疗。这表明对大型藻类补贴的负面影响的机制是缺氧条件的发展促进了硫化物的积累。因此,我们的研究是第一个发现临界阈值或生态临界点的人,超过该临界值或人为生态阈值的人为河口滩涂社区的人为增加的补贴的影响从正转为负,并描述了升高的补贴改变非生物环境的机制,并可能生态系统功能下降。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号