首页> 外文期刊>Oecologia >Advantages of masting in European beech: timing of granivore satiation and benefits of seed caching support the predator dispersal hypothesis
【24h】

Advantages of masting in European beech: timing of granivore satiation and benefits of seed caching support the predator dispersal hypothesis

机译:在欧洲山毛榉中肥育的优势:食肉动物饱食的时机和种子缓存的好处支持了捕食者的传播假设

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The predator satiation and predator dispersal hypotheses provide alternative explanations for masting. Both assume satiation of seed-eating vertebrates. They differ in whether satiation occurs before or after seed removal and caching by granivores (predator satiation and predator dispersal, respectively). This difference is largely unrecognized, but it is demographically important because cached seeds are dispersed and often have a microsite advantage over nondispersed seeds. We conducted rodent exclosure experiments in two mast and two nonmast years to test predictions of the predator dispersal hypothesis in our study system of yellow-necked mice (Apodemus flavicollis) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica). Specifically, we tested whether the fraction of seeds removed from the forest floor is similar during mast and nonmast years (i.e., lack of satiation before seed caching), whether masting decreases the removal of cached seeds (i.e., satiation after seed storage), and whether seed caching increases the probability of seedling emergence. We found that masting did not result in satiation at the seed removal stage. However, masting decreased the removal of cached seeds, and seed caching dramatically increased the probability of seedling emergence relative to noncached seeds. European beech thus benefits from masting through the satiation of scatterhoarders that occurs only after seeds are removed and cached. Although these findings do not exclude other evolutionary advantages of beech masting, they indicate that fitness benefits of masting extend beyond the most commonly considered advantages of predator satiation and increased pollination efficiency.
机译:食肉动物的饱足感和食肉动物的传播假设为肥大提供了替代解释。两者都以食种子脊椎动物为生。它们的区别在于饱食是否发生在种子去除和通过食肉动物缓存之前或之后(分别是食肉动物的食肉和食肉动物的散布)。这种差异在很大程度上是无法识别的,但在人口统计学上却很重要,因为缓存的种子是分散的,并且与未分散的种子相比,通常具有微站点优势。我们在两个桅杆和两个非桅杆年份进行了啮齿动物暴露实验,以测试我们的黄颈小鼠(Apodemus flavicollis)和欧洲山毛榉(Fagus sylvatica)的研究系统中对捕食者扩散假设的预测。具体来说,我们测试了在肥大年和非肥大年(即,种子缓存前缺乏饱足感),从森林中去除的种子比例是否相似,肥大是否减少了缓存种子的去除(即,种子储存后饱足感)以及种子缓存是否会增加幼苗出苗的可能性。我们发现,在种子去除阶段,配肥不会导致饱食。但是,喷浆减少了缓存种子的去除,相对于非缓存种子,种子缓存显着增加了幼苗出苗的可能性。因此,欧洲山毛榉受益于散布散杂物的饱满,这种散杂物只有在种子被取出并贮藏后才会发生。尽管这些发现并未排除山毛榉配肥的其他进化优势,但它们表明,配肥配肥的有益效果超出了捕食者饱食和提高授粉效率的最普遍考虑的优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号