首页> 外文期刊>Oecologia >Instantaneous-to-daily GPP upscaling schemes based on a coupled photosynthesis-stomatal conductance model: correcting the overestimation of GPP by directly using daily average meteorological inputs
【24h】

Instantaneous-to-daily GPP upscaling schemes based on a coupled photosynthesis-stomatal conductance model: correcting the overestimation of GPP by directly using daily average meteorological inputs

机译:基于耦合的光合作用-气孔电导模型的瞬时到每日GPP升级方案:直接使用每日平均气象输入来纠正GPP的高估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Daily canopy photosynthesis is usually temporally upscaled from instantaneous (i.e., seconds) photosynthesis rate. The nonlinear response of photosynthesis to meteorological variables makes the temporal scaling a significant challenge. In this study, two temporal upscaling schemes of daily photosynthesis, the integrated daily model (IDM) and the segmented daily model (SDM), are presented by considering the diurnal variations of meteorological variables based on a coupled photosynthesis-stomatal conductance model. The two models, as well as a simple average daily model (SADM) with daily average meteorological inputs, were validated using the tower-derived gross primary production (GPP) to assess their abilities in simulating daily photosynthesis. The results showed IDM closely followed the seasonal trend of the tower-derived GPP with an average RMSE of 1.63 g C m(-2) day(-1), and an average Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient (E) of 0.87. SDM performed similarly to IDM in GPP simulation but decreased the computation time by > 66 %. SADM overestimated daily GPP by about 15 % during the growing season compared to IDM. Both IDM and SDM greatly decreased the overestimation by SADM, and improved the simulation of daily GPP by reducing the RMSE by 34 and 30 %, respectively. The results indicated that IDM and SDM are useful temporal upscaling approaches, and both are superior to SADM in daily GPP simulation because they take into account the diurnally varying responses of photosynthesis to meteorological variables. SDM is computationally more efficient, and therefore more suitable for long-term and large-scale GPP simulations.
机译:日常冠层光合作用通常在瞬时(即秒)光合作用速率上暂时升高。光合作用对气象变量的非线性响应使得时间尺度成为一个重大挑战。在这项研究中,通过考虑基于耦合的光合作用-气孔导度模型的气象变量的日变化,提出了两种日常光合作用的时间放大方案,即综合日模型(IDM)和分段日模型(SDM)。这两个模型,以及具有每日平均气象输入的简单平均每日模型(SADM),都使用塔衍生的总初级生产量(GPP)进行了验证,以评估其模拟每日光合作用的能力。结果表明,IDM紧随塔衍生GPP的季节趋势,平均RMSE为1.63 g C m(-2)天(-1),平均Nash-Sutcliffe模型效率系数(E)为0.87。 SDM在GPP仿真中的执行与IDM相似,但是将计算时间减少了> 66%。与IDM相比,SADM在生长季节高估了每日GPP约15%。 IDM和SDM都大大减少了SADM的高估,并通过分别将RMSE降低了34%和30%来改善了每日GPP的仿真。结果表明,IDM和SDM是有用的时间上调方法,并且在日常GPP模拟中均优于SADM,因为它们考虑了光合作用对气象变量的日变化响应。 SDM的计算效率更高,因此更适合于长期和大规模的GPP仿真。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号