...
首页> 外文期刊>Oecologia >Relative importance of genetic, ontogenetic, induction, and seasonal variation in producing a multivariate defense phenotype in a foundation tree species
【24h】

Relative importance of genetic, ontogenetic, induction, and seasonal variation in producing a multivariate defense phenotype in a foundation tree species

机译:遗传,个体发育,诱导和季节变异在基础树种中产生多元防御表型的相对重要性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Plant adaptations for defense against herbivory vary both among species and among genotypes. Moreover, numerous forms of within-plant variation in defense, including ontogeny, induction, and seasonal gradients, allow plants to avoid expending resources on defense when herbivores are absent. We used an 18-year-old cottonwood common garden composed of Populus fremontii, Populus angustifolia, and their naturally occurring F1 hybrids (collectively referred to as "cross types") to quantify and compare the relative influences of three hierarchical levels of variation (between cross types, among genotypes, and within individual genotypes) on univariate and multivariate phytochemical defense traits. Within genotypes, we evaluated ontogeny, induction (following cottonwood leaf beetle herbivory), and seasonal variation. We compared the effect sizes of each of these sources of variation on the plant defense phenotype. Three major patterns emerged. First, we observed significant differences in concentrations of defense phytochemicals among cross types, and/or among genotypes within cross types. Second, we found significant genetic variation for within-plant differences in phytochemical defenses: (a) based on ontogeny, levels of constitutive phenolic glycosides were nearly three times greater in the mature zone than in the juvenile zone within one cottonwood cross type, but did not significantly differ within another cross type; (b) induced levels of condensed tannins increased up to 65% following herbivore damage within one cottonwood cross type, but were not significantly altered in another cross type; and (c) concentrations of condensed tannins tended to increase across the season, but did not do so across all cross types. Third, our estimates of effect size demonstrate that the magnitude of within-plant variation in a phytochemical defense can rival the magnitude of differences in defense among genotypes and/or cross types. We conclude that, in cottonwood and likely other plant species, multiple forms of within-individual variation have the potential to substantially influence ecological and evolutionary processes.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2344-6
机译:植物抗草食性的适应因物种和基因型而异。而且,植物内防御的多种形式,包括个体发育,诱导和季节梯度,都使得植物在缺少食草动物时可以避免在防御上花费资源。我们使用了一个18岁的杨木普通花园,该花园由fropus fremontii,Populus angustifolia及其自然形成的F 1 杂种(统称为“交叉类型”)组成,以量化和比较相对影响单变量和多变量植物化学防御性状的三个层次变化水平(在交叉类型之间,基因型之间以及单个基因型内)。在基因型中,我们评估了个体发育,诱导(跟随三叶草甲虫食草)和季节性变化。我们比较了这些变异来源对植物防御表型的影响大小。出现了三种主要模式。首先,我们观察到交叉类型之间和/或交叉类型内的基因型之间防御植物化学物质的浓度存在显着差异。其次,我们发现植物内植物化学防御方面的显着遗传差异:(a)基于个体发育,一种杨木杂交类型中成熟区的组成型酚类糖苷水平比少年区大近三倍,但是在另一个交叉类型内没有显着差异; (b)在一种三叶草杂交类型中,由于草食动物的损害,诱导的单宁浓缩水平增加了高达65%,但在另一种杂交类型中没有明显改变; (c)整个季节中缩合单宁浓度趋于增加,但并非在所有交叉类型中均如此。第三,我们对效应量的估计表明,植物化学防御中植物内变异的幅度可以与基因型和/或杂交类型之间防御差异的幅度相媲美。我们得出的结论是,在三角叶杨和其他可能的植物物种中,多种形式的个体内部变异可能会实质性地影响生态和进化过程。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2344 -6

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号