...
首页> 外文期刊>Oecologia >Coexistence and interference between a native perennial grass and non-native annual grasses in California
【24h】

Coexistence and interference between a native perennial grass and non-native annual grasses in California

机译:加利福尼亚本地多年生草与非本地一年生草之间的共存和干扰

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Using the example of native perennial bunchgrasses and non-native annual grasses in California grasslands, the effects of interference from non-native grasses (primarily Avena barbata, Bromus hordeaceus and Vulpia myuros) on the different life stages of the native perennial bunchgrass Nassella pulchra were investigated in relation to competition for water. In a series of field and greenhouse experiments involving removal of neighbouring plants and additions of water, it was found that seedling recruitment of N. pulchra was strongly limited by availability of seed. In both field and greenhouse experiments, natural recruitment of N. pulchra seedlings from grassland soil was extremely low. In field plots where seeds were added, addition of water to field plots increased density of N. pulchra seedlings by 88% and increased total aboveground N. pulchra seedling biomass by almost 90%, suggesting that water was the primary limiting resource. In the greenhouse, simulated drought early in the growing season had a greater negative effect on the biomass of annual grass seedlings than on the seedlings of N. pulchra. In the field, presence of annuals reduced growth and seed production of all sizes of N. pulchra, and these effects did not decrease as N. pulchra individuals increased in size. These negative effects appeared to be due to competition for water, because N. pulchra plants had less negative pre-dawn leaf water potentials when adjacent annual grasses were removed. Simply adding water caused the same increases in aboveground biomass and seed production of N. pulchra plants as removing all annual grasses. There was no evidence that established N. pulchra plants were able to suppress non-native annual grasses. Removing large N. pulchra individuals did not affect peak biomass per unit area of annuals.
机译:以加利福尼亚草原上的多年生丛生草和非原生一年生草为例,非原生草(主要是Avena barbata,Bromus hordeaceus和Vulpia myuros)的干扰对原生多年生丛生草Nassella pulchra的不同生命阶段的影响是调查有关水的竞争。在一系列涉及去除邻近植物和添加水的田间和温室试验中,发现N. pulchra的幼苗募集受到种子可用性的强烈限制。在田间试验和温室试验中,从草地土壤中自然吸收的N. pulchra幼苗非常少。在添加了种子的田间地块中,在田间地块中加水可使小叶猪笼草的密度增加88%,地上小叶猪笼草的总生物量增加近90%,这表明水是主要的限制资源。在温室中,生长季节初期的模拟干旱对一年生草幼苗的生物量的不利影响要大于对N. pulchra幼苗的不利影响。在田间,年生植物的存在降低了各种尺寸的N. pulchra的生长和种子产量,并且随着N. pulchra个体大小的增加,这些影响并没有减少。这些负面影响似乎是由于对水的竞争所致,因为当去除邻近的一年生草时,N。pulchra植物的黎明前负水势较小。仅仅添加水,与去除所有一年生禾草一样,引起N. pulchra植物地上生物量和种子产量的增加。没有证据表明已建立的N. pulchra植物能够抑制非本地一年生禾本科植物。除去大型猪笼草个体并不影响年生单位面积的峰值生物量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号