首页> 外文期刊>Oecologia >Co-pollinators and specialization in the pollinating seed-consumer mutualism between senita cacti and senita moths
【24h】

Co-pollinators and specialization in the pollinating seed-consumer mutualism between senita cacti and senita moths

机译:人工授粉和专业化花粉仙人掌和花粉蛾之间的授粉种子-消费者共生

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Specialization of a plant on a particular pollinator may not evolve if co-pollinators are effective and abundant. This is particularly evident if fruit set is resource limited and cannot be increased above the levels produced by the actions of co-pollinators. The pollinating seed-consuming interaction between senita cacti and senita moths in the Sonoran Desert presents a paradox because it exhibits many traits resembling those of the highly specialized yucca/yucca moth system, but also involves co-pollinators. For 6 years, we studied how contributions of nocturnal senita moths and diurnal co-pollinating bees to fruit set depended on resource and pollen limitation, time of flower closing, and the onset and phenology of flowering. Fruit set was typically resource limited. Fruit set of flowers exposed only to senita moths was not different from resource-limited fruit set of control flowers. When only co-pollinating bees were allowed to visit flowers, however, fruit set became pollen limited. Only in one year when fruit set was pollen limited were bees able to increase fruit set beyond the level resulting from senita moth pollination. High temperatures commonly induced flowers to close before sunrise so that diurnal bees were unable to visit flowers. This was particularly important from 1998 to 2000, when flowering did not begin until late in spring when temperatures were already high enough to induce flowers to close before sunrise. Bees were typically functionally redundant with senita moths; excluding bees from visiting flowers did not alter fruit set. Nevertheless, extreme specialization of floral traits to exclude co-pollinators has not evolved in senita, possibly because there are times when bees do increase fruit set. This can occur when senita moths are rare, fruit set is pollen limited, cool temperatures prevent flowers from closing before sunrise, and flowering begins early in spring.
机译:如果共花传粉有效且丰富,则特定传粉媒介上植物的专业化可能不会发展。如果坐果资源有限并且不能增加到超过授粉媒介的作用所产生的水平,这一点尤其明显。索诺兰沙漠中仙妮塔仙人掌和仙妮塔蛾之间的授粉种子消耗性相互作用表现出自相矛盾,因为它表现出与高度专业的丝兰/丝兰飞蛾系统相似的许多特征,但也涉及到授粉媒介。在6年的时间里,我们研究了夜蛾和昼夜授粉蜜蜂对坐果的贡献如何取决于资源和花粉限制,花朵关闭的时间以及花朵的发作和物候。坐果通常是资源有限的。仅暴露于蚕蛾的花朵的花果组与资源有限的对照花的果树组没有区别。但是,当只允许混合授粉的蜜蜂访花时,坐果就变得有限了花粉。仅在坐果受粉限的一年内,蜜蜂才能使坐果增加到超过蛾蛾授粉导致的坐果水平。高温通常导致花朵在日出之前关闭,因此昼间的蜜蜂无法接近花朵。这一点在1998年至2000年尤为重要,当时开花直到春季末才开始,当时温度已经很高到足以诱使花朵在日出前关闭。蜜蜂通常在功能上与Senita蛾相似。将蜜蜂排除在访问花朵之外并没有改变坐果。然而,在花粉症中,没有排除花粉性状的极端专业化可能是因为蜜蜂有时会增加坐果率。这种情况可能会在以下情况发生:蛾类少见,坐果受花粉限制,凉爽的温度阻止花朵在日出前关闭,而开花在春季初开始。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号