...
首页> 外文期刊>Oecologia >Comparative pollinator limitation of two non-native shrubs: do mutualisms influence invasions?
【24h】

Comparative pollinator limitation of two non-native shrubs: do mutualisms influence invasions?

机译:两种非本地灌木的传粉媒介比较局限:共生关系是否会影响入侵?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

While interactions between invaders and resident species have received a great deal of attention recently, the role of mutualists in facilitating or constraining invasions is rarely considered. We investigated the reproductive ecology of two closely related, woody legumes. Cytisus scoparius (Scotch broom) and Genista monspessulana (French broom). invading the same sites. Both species are considered noxious non-native weeds in California. and are considered to be ecologically similar. but Genista has much smaller flowers than Cytisus. Neither species showed appreciable levels of autogamous selfing. When experimentally self-pollinated, Genista demonstrated less depression of fruit set and seed set relative to outcrossed flowers than did Cytisus. At two sites on the Marin peninsula. Calif., Genista flowers were consistently less likely to be pollinated than Cytisus flowers. Genista was significantly pollen limited at both sites. while Cytisus was pollen limited at only the site with lower visitation rates. In the three populations with demonstrable pollen limitation. we found a significant relationship between fruit production and natural pollinator visitation at the level of the individual plant. However. we did not find that overall patterns of fecundity were strongly predicted by differences in pollen limitation between species or between sites. While a previous study found a tight link between patterns of pollinator visitation and patterns of reproduction in Cytisus in Washington State. we conclude that a more complex and variable environment (in terms of resources. herbivores. and florivores) on the Marin Peninsula de-coupled the relationship between pollinators and fruit production in these invaders. Our results suggest that the role of mutualisms in promoting or constraining invasions is likely to vary considerably among invaded communities.
机译:尽管入侵者与居民物种之间的相互作用最近受到了广泛关注,但很少考虑互助者在促进或限制入侵方面的作用。我们调查了两个密切相关的木质豆科植物的生殖生态。 Cytisus scoparius(苏格兰扫帚)和Genista monspessulana(法国扫帚)。入侵相同的网站。这两种物种在加利福尼亚都被认为是有害的非本地杂草。并且被认为在生态上相似。但是Genista的花比Cytisus小得多。两种物种均未显示出明显的自交自交水平。当通过实验自花授粉时,Genista表现出的结实和种子结实相对于异交花的减少比Cytisus少。在马林半岛的两个地点。加利福尼亚州Genista的花比Cytisus的花一直不太可能被授粉。 Genista在两个站点上的花粉明显受限。 Cytisus的花粉仅限于探访率较低的部位。在三个具有明显花粉限制的种群中。我们在单个植物的水平上发现了水果产量与自然授粉者探访之间的显着关系。然而。我们没有发现繁殖力的总体模式是由物种之间或站点之间的花粉限制差异强烈预测的。先前的一项研究发现传粉者访问模式与华盛顿州Cytisus繁殖模式之间存在紧密联系。我们得出的结论是,马林半岛上更为复杂和多变的环境(就资源,食草动物和食肉动物而言)使这些入侵者的传粉媒介与水果生产之间的关系脱钩。我们的结果表明,在入侵社区中,共产主义在促进或限制入侵中的作用可能存在很大差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号