...
首页> 外文期刊>Oecologia >Scale-dependent bi-trophic interactions in a semi-arid savanna: how herbivores eliminate benefits of nutrient patchiness to plants
【24h】

Scale-dependent bi-trophic interactions in a semi-arid savanna: how herbivores eliminate benefits of nutrient patchiness to plants

机译:半干旱稀树草原中依赖尺度的双营养相互作用:草食动物如何消除养分斑块对植物的好处

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The scale of resource heterogeneity may influence how resources are locally partitioned between co-existing large and small organisms such as trees and grasses in savannas. Scale-related plant responses may, in turn, influence herbivore use of the vegetation. To examine these scale-dependent bi-trophic interactions, we varied fertilizer [(nitrogen (N)/phosphorus (P)/potassium (K)] applications to patches to create different scales of nutrient patchiness (patch size 2 x 2 m, 10 x 10 m, or whole-plot 50 x 50 m) in a large field experiment in intact African savanna. Within-patch fertilizer concentration and the total fertilizer load per plot were independently varied. We found that fertilization increased the leaf N and P concentrations of trees and grasses, resulting in elevated utilization by browsers and grazers. Herbivory off-take was particularly considerable at higher nutrient concentrations. Scale-dependent effects were weak. The net effect of fertilization and herbivory was that plants in fertilized areas tended to grow less and develop smaller rather than larger standing biomass compared to plants growing in areas that remained unfertilized. When all of these effects were considered together at the community (plot) level, herbivory completely eliminated the positive effects of fertilization on the plant community. While this was true for all scales of fertilization, grasses tended to profit more from coarse-grained fertilization and trees from fine-grained fertilization. We conclude that in herbivore-dominated communities, such as the African savanna, nutrient patchiness results in the herbivore community profiting rather more than the plant community, irrespective of the scale of patchiness. At the community level, the allometric scaling theory's prediction of plant-and probably also animal-production does not hold or may even be reversed as a result of complex bi-trophic interactions.
机译:资源异质性的规模可能会影响资源在热带稀疏草原上的树木和草等共存的大小生物之间的局部分配方式。与规模有关的植物反应可能反过来影响草食动物对植被的利用。为了检查这些与比例有关的双营养相互作用,我们将肥料[(氮(N)/磷(P)/钾(K))]的施用量不同,以产生不同规模的养分斑块(斑块大小2 x 2 m,10 x 10 m,或整个田间50 x 50 m)在完整的非洲大草原上进行,田间施肥浓度和每块施肥总量独立变化,我们发现施肥提高了叶片的氮和磷浓度的树木和草类,导致浏览器和草食者的利用率提高;在较高的养分浓度下,食草动物的摄取尤为可观;规模效应不明显;施肥和食草的净效应是受精地区的植物生长较少与在未施肥地区生长的植物相比,它们产生的站立生物量较小而不是更大。当在社区(地块)水平上综合考虑所有这些影响时,食草完全消除了施肥对植物群落的积极影响。尽管在所有规模的施肥情况下都是如此,但草种往往会从粗粒化肥中获利,而树木则可以从细粒化肥中获利。我们得出的结论是,在以草食动物为主的社区(例如非洲大草原)中,养分斑块导致草食动物社区的获利大于植物群落,而不论斑块的规模如何。在社区一级,由于复杂的双营养相互作用,异速生长定标理论对植物以及动物的产量的预测不成立甚至可能被逆转。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号