首页> 外文期刊>Ocean modelling >A generalized coordinate ocean model and a comparison of the bottom boundary layer dynamics in terrain-following and in z-level grids
【24h】

A generalized coordinate ocean model and a comparison of the bottom boundary layer dynamics in terrain-following and in z-level grids

机译:广义坐标海洋模型以及地形跟踪和z层网格中底部边界层动力学的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Sensitivity studies with a new generalized coordinate ocean model are performed in order to compare the behavior of bottom boundary layers (BBLs) when terrain-following (sigma or combined sigma and z-level) or z-level vertical grids are used, but most other numerical aspects remain unchanged. The model uses a second-order turbulence closure scheme that provides surface and BBL mixing and results in a quite realistic climatology and deep water masses after 100 year simulations with a coarse resolution (1° × 1°) basin-scale terrain-following grid. However, with the same turbulence scheme but using a z-level grid, the model was unable to produce dense water masses in the deep ocean. The latter is a known problem for coarse resolution z-level models, unless they include highly empirical BBL schemes.A set of dense water overflow experiments with high-resolution grids (10 and 2.5 km) are used to investigate the influence of model parameters such as horizontal diffusivity, vertical mixing, horizontal resolution, and vertical resolution on the simulation of bottom layers for the different coordinate systems. Increasing horizontal diffusivity causes a thinner BBL and a bottom plume that extends further downslope in a sigma grid, but causes a thicker BBL and limited downslope plume extension in a z-level grid. A major difference in the behavior of the BBL in the two grids is due to the larger vertical mixing generated by the turbulence scheme over the step-like topography in the z-level grid, compared to a smaller vertical mixing and a more stably stratified BBL in the sigma grid. Therefore, the dense plume is able to maintain its water mass better and penetrates farther downslope in the sigma grid than in the z-level grid. Increasing horizontal and vertical resolution in the z-level grid converges the results toward those obtained by a much coarser resolution sigma coordinate grid, but some differences remain due to the basic differences in the mixing process in the BBL.
机译:为了比较使用地形跟踪(sigma或sigma或sigma和z级的组合)或z级垂直网格时底部边界层(BBL)的行为,使用新的广义坐标海洋模型进行了敏感性研究,但大多数其他情况数值方面保持不变。该模型使用二阶湍流闭合方案,该方案提供了表面和BBL的混合,经过100年的模拟(具有粗分辨率(1°×1°)的盆地尺度地形跟踪网格),产生了相当逼真的气候和深水团块。但是,在相同的湍流方案但使用z级网格的情况下,该模型无法在深海中产生密集的水团。后者是粗分辨率z级模型的已知问题,除非它们包含高度经验的BBL方案。使用一组具有高分辨率网格(10和2.5 km)的密集水溢出实验来研究模型参数的影响,例如模拟不同坐标系下底层的水平扩散率,垂直混合,水平分辨率和垂直分辨率。水平扩散率的增加会导致BBL变薄,并且底部羽状结构在sigma网格中进一步向下倾斜延伸,但在z级网格中会导致BBL较厚且下坡羽状区域扩展受到限制。 BBL在两个栅格中的行为的主要区别在于,与较小的垂直混合和更稳定的BBL相比,湍流方案在z级栅格中的阶跃形貌上产生了更大的垂直混合在sigma网格中。因此,稠密的羽状流能够更好地保持其水量,并且比z级网格中的sigma网格中的下坡更深。 z层网格中水平和垂直分辨率的提高将结果收敛于分辨率更高的西格玛坐标网格所获得的结果,但是由于BBL中混合过程的基本差异,仍然存在一些差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号