首页> 外文期刊>Obstetrics and Gynecology: Journal of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists >Revisiting the Fetal Loss Rate After Second-Trimester Genetic Amniocentesis: A Single Center's 16-Year Experience.
【24h】

Revisiting the Fetal Loss Rate After Second-Trimester Genetic Amniocentesis: A Single Center's 16-Year Experience.

机译:重新审视妊娠中期妊娠后羊膜穿刺术的胎儿丢失率:单个中心的16年经验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To estimate an institution's specific fetal loss rate after a second-trimester genetic amniocentesis. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using our prenatal diagnosis database for all pregnant women presenting for care between 1990 and 2006. We compared the fetal loss rate in women who underwent amniocentesis between 15 and 22 weeks of gestation with those women who did not have any invasive procedure and had a live fetus documented on ultrasound examination between 15 and 22 weeks. Only singleton gestations were included. Logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for potential confounders between the groups. RESULTS: Among 58,436 women meeting the inclusion criteria, complete outcome data were available for 51,557 (88%), 11,746 (91%) in the amniocentesis group and 39,811 (87%) in the group that did not have amniocentesis. The fetal loss (miscarriages and intrauterine fetal death) rate in the amniocentesis group was 0.4% compared with 0.26% in those without amniocentesis (relative risk 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-2.2). Fetal loss less than 24 weeks (including induction for ruptured membranes and oligohydramnios) occurred in 0.97% of the amniocentesis group and 0.84% of the group with no procedure (P=.33). The fetal loss rate less than 24 weeks attributable to amniocentesis was 0.13% (95% CI -0.07 to 0.20%) or 1 in 769. The only subgroup that had a significantly higher amniocentesis attributable fetal loss rate was women with a normal serum screen (0.17%, P=.03). CONCLUSION: The institutional fetal loss rate attributable to amniocentesis is 0.13%, or 1 in 769 at Washington University School of Medicine. The total fetal loss rate was not significantly different from that observed in patients who had no procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
机译:目的:评估一个机构在妊娠中期遗传羊膜穿刺术后的特定胎儿流失率。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用我们的产前诊断数据库对1990年至2006年之间就诊的所有孕妇进行了比较。我们比较了在妊娠15到22周之间接受羊膜穿刺术的女性和未接受过羊膜穿刺术的女性的胎儿丢失率在15到22周之间进行超声检查,记录有活的胎儿。仅包括单胎妊娠。使用逻辑回归分析来调整各组之间的潜在混杂因素。结果:在符合纳入标准的58,436名妇女中,可获得完整的结局数据,其中羊膜穿刺术组为51,557(88%),羊膜穿刺术组为11,746(91%),而没有羊膜穿刺术的组为39,811(87%)。羊膜腔穿刺术组的胎儿丢失率(流产和宫内胎儿死亡)为0.4%,而没有羊膜腔穿刺术的胎儿率为0.26%(相对危险度1.6,95%置信区间[CI] 1.1-2.2)。在没有手术的情况下,羊膜穿刺术组中有0.97%的胎儿损失少于24周(包括破膜和羊水过少的诱导),而无手术的胎儿损失为0.84%(P = .33)。羊膜腔穿刺术引起的少于24周的胎儿丢失率为0.13%(95%CI -0.07至0.20%)或769分之一。唯一具有显着更高的羊膜腔穿刺术可导致胎儿丢失率的亚组是血清筛检正常的女性( 0.17%,P = .03)。结论:由羊膜腔穿刺术引起的机构性胎儿流失率为0.13%,在华盛顿大学医学院为769分之一。总的胎儿丢失率与没有手术的患者观察到的无明显差异。证据级别:II。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号