首页> 外文期刊>Obstetrics and Gynecology: Journal of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists >ACOG Practice Bulletin. Assessment of risk factors for preterm birth. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 31, October 2001. (Replaces Technical Bulletin number 206, June 1995; Committee Opinion number 172, May 1996;
【24h】

ACOG Practice Bulletin. Assessment of risk factors for preterm birth. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 31, October 2001. (Replaces Technical Bulletin number 206, June 1995; Committee Opinion number 172, May 1996;

机译:ACOG实践公告。评估早产的危险因素。妇产科医生的临床管理指南。 2001年10月第31号。(代替1995年6月的技术公告206; 1996年5月的委员会第172号意见;以及

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Preterm birth is the second leading cause of neonatal mortality in the United States (1) (second only to birth defects), and preterm labor is the cause of most preterm births (2). Neonatal intensive care has improved the survival rate for babies at the cusp of viability, but it also has increased the proportion of survivors with disabilities. The incidence of multiple births also has increased along with the associated risk of preterm delivery (4). Interventions to delay preterm delivery in these settings have not shown conclusive effectiveness. Because the morbidity of babies born after 34-35 weeks of gestation has diminished, most efforts to identify preterm deliveries have focused on deliveries before this age. This document describes the various methods proposed for predicting preterm birth and the evidence for their roles in clinical practice.
机译:早产是美国新生儿死亡率的第二大主要原因(1)(仅次于出生缺陷),而早产是大多数早产的原因(2)。新生儿重症监护提高了存活率的婴儿的存活率,但也增加了残障幸存者的比例。多胎分娩的发生率也随着早产的相关风险而增加(4)。在这些情况下延迟早产的干预措施尚未显示出最终的效果。由于妊娠34-35周后出生的婴儿的发病率已经降低,因此识别早产的大多数工作都集中在该年龄之前的分娩上。本文档介绍了用于预测早产的各种方法及其在临床实践中作用的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号