首页> 外文期刊>Obstetrics and Gynecology: Journal of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists >Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer compared with traditional laparoscopic and laparotomy approaches: a systematic review.
【24h】

Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer compared with traditional laparoscopic and laparotomy approaches: a systematic review.

机译:与传统的腹腔镜和剖腹手术方法相比,机器人辅助子宫内膜癌的子宫内膜切除术:系统评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To summarize comparative studies describing clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgeries compared with traditional laparoscopic or laparotomy techniques for the treatment of endometrial cancer. DATA SOURCES: Using search words "robotic hysterectomy" and "endometrial cancer," 22 citations were identified from Medline and PubMed (2005 to February 2010). METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: We selected English language studies reporting at least 25 robotic cases compared with laparoscopic or laparotomy cases that also addressed surgical technique, complications, and perioperative outcomes. Patients underwent total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and lymphadenectomy. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Eight eligible comparative studies were identified that included 1,591 patients (robotic=589, laparoscopic=396, and laparotomy=606). Pooled means of the resected aortic lymph nodes for robotic hysterectomy and laparoscopy were 10.3 and 7.8 (P=.15), and robotic hysterectomy and laparotomy were 9.4 and 5.7 (P=.28). Pooled means of pelvic lymph nodes for robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy were 18.5 and 17.8 (P=.95) and 18.0 compared with 14.5 (P=.11) for robotic hysterectomy compared with laparotomy. Estimated blood loss was reduced in robotic hysterectomy compared with laparotomy (P<.005) and laparoscopy (P=.001). Length of stay was shorter for both robotic and laparoscopic cases compared with laparotomy (P<.01). Operative time for robotic hysterectomy was similar to laparoscopic cases but was greater than laparotomy (P<.005). Conversion to laparotomy for laparoscopic hysterectomy was 9.9% compared with 4.9% for robotic cases (P=.06). Vascular, bowel, and bladder injuries; cuff dehiscence; and thromboembolic complications were similar for each surgical method. Transfusions for robotic hysterectomy compared with laparotomy was 1.7% and 7.2% (P=.06) and robotic hysterectomy compared were laparoscopy was 2.6% and 5.0% (P=.22). CONCLUSION: Perioperative clinical outcomes for robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy appear similar with the exception of less blood loss for robotic cases and longer operative times for robotic and laparoscopy cases.
机译:目的:总结比较研究,描述机器人辅助手术与传统腹腔镜或剖腹术治疗子宫内膜癌的临床结果。数据来源:使用搜索词“机器人子宫切除术”和“子宫内膜癌”,从Medline和PubMed(2005年至2010年2月)中确定了22条引用文献。研究选择方法:我们选择的英语研究报告了至少25例机器人病例,而腹腔镜或剖腹手术病例也涉及手术技术,并发症和围手术期结局。患者接受了全子宫切除术,双侧输卵管卵巢切除术和淋巴结切除术。表,整合和结果:确定了八项合格的比较研究,包括1,591例患者(机器人= 589,腹腔镜= 396,剖腹= 606)。机器人子宫切除术和腹腔镜手术切除的主动脉淋巴结的合并平均值为10.3和7.8(P = .15),机器人子宫切除术和剖腹术分别为9.4和5.7(P = .28)。与剖腹术相比,机器人子宫和腹腔镜子宫切除术的盆腔淋巴结的合并平均值分别为18.5和17.8(P = .95)和18.0,而机器人子宫切除术的盆腔淋巴结的合并平均值为14.5(P = .11)。与开腹手术(P <.005)和腹腔镜检查(P = .001)相比,机器人子宫切除术的估计失血量减少了。与开腹手术相比,机器人和腹腔镜手术患者的住院时间都较短(P <.01)。机器人子宫切除术的手术时间与腹腔镜手术相似,但比剖腹手术要长(P <.005)。腹腔镜子宫切除术的开腹手术率为9.9%,机器人病例为4.9%(P = .06)。血管,肠和膀胱损伤;袖口裂开每种手术方法的血栓栓塞并发症均相似。机器人子宫切除术与开腹术相比输血分别为1.7%和7.2%(P = .06),机器人子宫切除术与腹腔镜检查相比分别为2.6%和5.0%(P = .22)。结论:机器人和腹腔镜子宫切除术的围手术期临床结果相似,除了机器人病例的失血量少,机器人和腹腔镜病例的手术时间更长。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号