首页> 外文期刊>Obstetrical and gynecological survey >Cost differences among robotic, vaginal, and abdominal hysterectomy
【24h】

Cost differences among robotic, vaginal, and abdominal hysterectomy

机译:机器人,阴道和腹部子宫切除术之间的成本差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends vaginal hysterectomy as a primary method for performing hysterectomy. This route is less costly than either abdominal or traditional laparoscopic approaches. Over the past 10 to 15 years, the robotic approach to hysterectomy has become increasingly popular, and many health care practitioners have incorporated it into their practice. Several studies have shown that the robotically assisted hysterectomy may be more expensive than traditional laparoscopy and laparotomy. Although it seems likely that robotic hysterectomy should also be more expensive than vaginal hysterectomy, only 2 studies have directly compared inpatient costs between these 2 methods.
机译:美国妇产科学院推荐阴道子宫切除术作为进行子宫切除术的主要方法。与腹部或传统腹腔镜手术相比,这种方法的成本更低。在过去的10到15年中,子宫切除的机器人方法变得越来越流行,许多医疗保健从业者已将其纳入其实践。多项研究表明,机器人辅助子宫切除术可能比传统的腹腔镜检查和剖腹术更昂贵。尽管机器人子宫切除术似乎也应该比阴道子宫切除术更昂贵,但只有两项研究直接比较了这两种方法的住院费用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号