首页> 外文期刊>Obstetrical and gynecological survey >A Randomized Trial of Urodynamic Testing Before Stress-Incontinence Surgery
【24h】

A Randomized Trial of Urodynamic Testing Before Stress-Incontinence Surgery

机译:压力性尿失禁手术前尿动力学检查的随机试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Urodynamic testing is often performed preoperatively for stress urinary incontinence. However, previous studies have not demonstrated improved surgical outcomes with such testing. No randomized controlled trials have addressed this issue.This multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial compared outcomes at 1 year among women with uncomplicated stress urinary incontinence who underwent preoperative urodynamic testing and office evaluation before their planned surgery and those who received evaluation only. Treatment success at 12 months, the primary outcome, was defined as a reduction on the Urogenital Distress Inventory score of 70% or more and a Patient Global Impression of Improvement response of "very much better" or "much better." A predetermined noninferiority margin of 11 percentage points was selected on the basis of clinical judgment.Of the 630 patients evaluated, 315 were randomized to office evaluation with urodynamic tests and 315 to evaluation only. Treatment was successful in 76.9% (203/ 264) of women in the urodynamic-testing group as compared with 77.2% (200/259) of those in the evaluation-only group; the between-group difference of -0.3 percentage points (95% confidence interval, -7.5 to 6.9) was consistent with noninferiority. No significant between-group differences were found for secondary measures, including incontinence severity, quality of life, patient satisfaction, rates of positive provocative stress tests, voiding dysfunction, or adverse events. Women in the urodynamic-testing group were significantly less likely to receive a diagnosis of an overactive bladder and were more likely to receive a diagnosis of voiding-phase dysfunction than those in the evaluation-only group. However, this change in preoperative diagnosis after urodynamic testing did not result in significant differences in treatment selection or outcomes.These findings indicate that routine preoperative urodynamic testing for women with uncomplicated stress urinary incontinence does not improve outcomes at 1 year over that found with in-office evaluation alone.
机译:尿动力学检查通常在术前进行,以应对压力性尿失禁。但是,以前的研究尚未证明通过这种测试可以改善手术效果。尚无针对该问题的随机对照试验。这项多中心,随机,非劣效性试验比较了单纯性压力性尿失禁的女性在计划手术前进行术前尿动力学检查和办公室评估的妇女在1年时的结果以及仅接受评估的妇女。在12个月时的治疗成功(主要结局)被定义为泌尿生殖窘迫清单得分降低70%或以上,并且患者对改善反应的总体印象为“好得多”或“好得多”。根据临床判断选择预定的11百分点的非劣效性边缘。在630名接受评估的患者中,有315名被随机分配至进行尿动力学检查的办公室评估,另有315名仅进行评估。尿动力学测试组中76.9%(203/264)的女性治疗成功,而仅评估组的女性为77.2%(200/259);组间差异为-0.3个百分点(95%置信区间为-7.5至6.9)与非自卑相一致。次要措施,包括失禁严重程度,生活质量,患者满意度,挑衅性压力测试阳性率,排尿功能障碍或不良事件,均未发现组间的显着差异。与仅评估组的女性相比,尿动力学测试组的女性接受膀胱过度活动症诊断的可能性大大降低,而排尿期功能障碍的诊断可能性更高。但是,尿动力学检查后术前诊断的这种改变并未导致治疗选择或结局的显着差异。这些发现表明,对于没有并发症的压力性尿失禁的妇女,常规术前尿动力学检查不能比1年来的改善。仅办公室评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号