首页> 外文期刊>Obstetrical and gynecological survey >Risk for maternal and neonatal complications in a subsequent pregnancy after planned cesarean delivery in a first birth, compared with emergency cesarean delivery: A nationwide comparative cohort study
【24h】

Risk for maternal and neonatal complications in a subsequent pregnancy after planned cesarean delivery in a first birth, compared with emergency cesarean delivery: A nationwide comparative cohort study

机译:一项全国比较队列研究,与计划进行紧急剖宫产相比,计划在第一胎剖腹产后在随后的妊娠中母婴和新生儿并发症的风险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Assessing patient-reported health behaviors is a critical first step in prioritizing prevention in primary care. We assessed the feasibility of point-of-care behavioral health assessment in 9 diverse primary care practices, including 4 federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), 4 practice-based research network practices, and a Department of Veterans Affairs practice. Methods: In this prospective mixed-methods study, practices were asked to integrate a standardized paper-based health behavior and mental health assessment into their workflow for ≥50 patients. We used 3 data sources to examine the implementation process: (1) patient responses to the health assessment, (2) patient feedback surveys about how assessments were used during encounters, and (3) postimplementation interviews. Results: Most nonurgent patients (71%) visiting the participating practices during the implementation period completed the health assessment, but reach varied by practice (range, 59% to 88%). Unhealthy diet, sedentary lifestyle, and stress were the most common patient problems, with similar frequencies observed across practices. The median number of "positive screens" per patient was similar among FQHCs (3.7 positives; standard deviation [SD], 1.8), practice-based research network practices (3.8 positives; SD, 1.9), and the Veterans Affairs clinic (4.1 positives; SD, 2.0). Primary care clinicians discussed assessment results with patients about half of the time (54%), with considerable variation between practices (range, 13% to 66%; lowest use among FQHC clinicians). Although clinicians were interested in routinely implementing assessments, many reported not feeling confident of having resources or support to address all patients' behavioral health needs. Conclusions: Primary care practices will need to revamp their patient-reported data collection processes to integrate routine health behavior assessments. Implementation support will be required if health assessments are to be actively used as part of routine primary care.
机译:背景:评估患者报告的健康行为是在初级保健中优先预防的关键第一步。我们评估了9种多样的初级保健实践中进行即时护理行为健康评估的可行性,其中包括4个联邦合格的健康中心(FQHC),4个基于实践的研究网络实践以及退伍军人事务部的实践。方法:在这项前瞻性混合方法研究中,要求实践将≥50名患者的标准化纸质健康行为和心理健康评估纳入其工作流程。我们使用了3个数据源来检查实施过程:(1)患者对健康评估的反应,(2)患者在相遇期间如何使用评估的反馈调查,以及(3)实施后访谈。结果:在实施期间,大多数非急诊患者(71%)参加了参与实践,均完成了健康评估,但范围因实践而异(范围从59%到88%)。不健康的饮食,久坐的生活方式和压力是最常见的患者问题,在各种实践中观察到的发生频率相似。在FQHC中,每名患者的“阳性筛查”中位数(3.7阳性;标准差[SD]为1.8),基于实践的研究网络实践(3.8阳性; SD为1.9)和退伍军人事务诊所(4.1阳性)相似。 ; SD,2.0)。初级保健临床医生大约一半时间与患者讨论评估结果(54%),实践之间差异很大(范围从13%到66%;在FQHC临床医生中使用率最低)。尽管临床医生对例行评估很感兴趣,但许多人报告说对拥有足够资源或支持来满足所有患者的行为健康需求感到不自信。结论:初级保健实践将需要修改其患者报告的数据收集流程,以整合常规的健康行为评估。如果要积极地将健康评估作为常规初级保健的一部分,则需要实施支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号