首页> 外文期刊>Obstetrical and gynecological survey >Systematic review of therapies for noncyclic chronic pelvic pain in women
【24h】

Systematic review of therapies for noncyclic chronic pelvic pain in women

机译:女性非周期性慢性盆腔痛治疗方法的系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We synthesized the literature (articles published between 1990 and May 2011) on the treatment of noncyclic and mixed cycliconcyclic chronic pelvic pain (CPP) in adult women. Two reviewers assessed studies against predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria, extracted data regarding participant and intervention characteristics and outcomes, and assigned overall quality and strength of evidence ratings. Of 2081 studies, 21 addressed surgical or nonsurgical interventions. Definitions of CPP and participant characteristics varied across studies, and most studies were of poor quality, which precluded data synthesis. Although surgical and nonsurgical approaches both improved pain, neither was more effective when directly compared in 3 studies. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis or laparoscopic uterosacral nerve ablation did not further improve pain scores over diagnostic laparoscopy. The evidence to conclude that surgical intervention is either effective or ineffective or that one technique is superior to another is insufficient. Most studies on nonsurgical approaches evaluated hormonal therapies in endometriosis-associated CPP and were not placebo controlled. Few studies addressed nonhormonal or nonpharmacologic approaches. Harms reporting was limited. Overall, no nonsurgical treatment was more or less effective than another, except for the clear negative effect of raloxifene. In general, the literature addressing therapies for CPP in women is of poor quality and inconclusive. Improved characterizations of the targeted condition and interventions in CPP research, including a uniform definition and standardized evaluation, are necessary to inform treatment choices.Target Audience: Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family PhysiciansLearning Objectives: After completion of this article, the reader should be able to assess the effects of surgical and nonsurgical interventions on the outcomes of pain status, functional status, satisfaction with care, and quality of life; to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions for noncyclic chronic pelvic pain; and to categorize areas of future research need.
机译:我们综合了有关成年女性非周期性和周期性/非周期性慢性盆腔疼痛(CPP)治疗的文献(1990年至2011年5月之间发表的文章)。两名评价者根据预定的纳入/排除标准对研究进行了评估,提取了有关参与者和干预特征与结果的数据,并确定了总体质量和证据等级。在2081项研究中,有21项涉及手术或非手术干预。 CPP的定义和参与者特征因研究而异,大多数研究质量较差,因此无法进行数据综合。尽管手术和非手术方法均可改善疼痛,但在3项研究中直接比较时,两种方法均无效。腹腔镜粘连溶解术或腹腔镜子宫lysis神经消融术并未比诊断性腹腔镜术进一步改善疼痛评分。得出结论认为手术干预有效或无效,或者一种技术优于另一种的证据不足。大多数关于非手术方法的研究都评估了子宫内膜异位症相关的CPP中的激素治疗,并且不受安慰剂控制。很少有研究涉及非激素或非药物学方法。危害报告有限。总体而言,除了雷洛昔芬明显的负面作用外,没有任何一种非手术疗法比其他疗法更有效。总体而言,有关女性CPP治疗的文献质量低下且没有定论。目标人群:妇产科医生,家庭医师学习目标:本文完成后,读者应该能够评估手术和非手术干预对疼痛状态,功能状态,护理满意度和生活质量的影响;评价非周期性慢性盆腔疼痛的干预措施的有效性;并对未来研究的领域进行分类。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号