...
首页> 外文期刊>Occupational medicine >Shift work effects on serial PEF measurements for occupational asthma
【24h】

Shift work effects on serial PEF measurements for occupational asthma

机译:轮班工作对职业性哮喘系列PEF测量的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Diurnal variation (DV) affects lung function but the changes are thought to be related to sleep patterns rather than time of day. When diagnosing occupational asthma (OA), serial peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements are the recommended first line investigation, but could be confounded by shift work. Aims: The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of shift work on PEF measurements used for diagnosing OA. Methods: PEF records containing more than one shift pattern with ≥4 days per shift were identified. OA diagnosis was based on an Oasys-2 score ≥2.51 and non-OA on having an alternative clinical diagnosis and Oasys-2 score <2.51. The mean area between curves (ABC) score, mean PEF DV and cross-shift PEF changes were calculated for each shift.. Results: Records from 123 workers with OA and 69 without OA satisfied inclusion criteria. In the OA group, PEF declined more on afternoon and night shifts than days (P < 0.001). The ABC score was lower in the OA group on night (P < 0.05) and afternoon shifts (P < 0.05) as compared with days, without significant differences in DV. Among those without OA, cross-shift PEF increased more on day shifts (mean + 25 l/min) than afternoon or night shifts (+1 l/min) (P < 0.001). The sensitivity for the ABC score and DV were good and similar across shifts, but specificity was reduced using DV (DV mean 39%; ABC 98%). Conclusions: PEF responses between work and rest show small differences according to shift type. The ABC score has a high sensitivity and specificity for all shifts; differences in DV have lower specificity.
机译:背景:日间变化(DV)影响肺功能,但这种变化被认为与睡眠方式有关,而不是一天中的时间。诊断职业性哮喘(OA)时,建议一线检查连续性呼气峰值流量(PEF),但可能会因轮班工作而混淆。目的:该研究的目的是调查轮班工作对用于诊断OA的PEF测量的影响。方法:鉴定包含一个以上班次且每个班次≥4天的PEF记录。 OA诊断基于Oasys-2得分≥2.51,而非OA具有替代临床诊断且Oasys-2得分<2.51。计算每个班次的曲线之间平均面积(ABC)得分,平均PEF DV和跨班次PEF变化。结果:来自123名患有OA的工人和69名没有OA的工人的记录满足纳入标准。在OA组中,PEF在下午和晚上的倒班下降幅度大于天数(P <0.001)。与白天相比,OA组的夜间(P <0.05)和下午班(P <0.05)的ABC评分较低,DV差异无统计学意义。在没有OA的人群中,跨班PEF在日班(平均+ 25 l / min)上比下午或夜间班(+1 l / min)增加更多(P <0.001)。 ABC评分和DV的敏感性很好,并且在各班次中相似,但是使用DV降低了特异性(DV平均39%; ABC 98%)。结论:根据班次类型,工作与休息之间的PEF反应显示出很小的差异。 ABC分数对所有班次都具有很高的敏感性和特异性。 DV的差异具有较低的特异性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号