【24h】

OFF-CENTRE

机译:非中心

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Like many readers of Ceramic Review, I watched and enjoyed the recent BBC TV series Ceramics: A Fragile History. All three programmes in the series were absorbing and full of fascinating detail. However, I was left with a sense of unease, bordering on disappointment, with the third part of the series, which dealt with the development of studio pottery in Britain. The period between the late nineteenth century and the Second World War was well covered, describing the rise of Bernard Leach and his followers, such as Michael Cardew. The programme claimed that Bernard Leach single-handedly developed studio pottery, but what was not properly explained was how he became so influential. How did so many studio potters come to set up in the post-war period, especially during the 1960s and 1970s? They could not possibly all have emerged from apprenticeships at a few pioneering potteries such as Leach's. There had to have been other, substantial means of spreading Leach's ideals and popularising studio pottery. Educational institutions, new private galleries, and craft organisations all played a key role but were not mentioned in the programme.
机译:像许多《陶瓷评论》的读者一样,我观看并欣赏了BBC最近的电视连续剧《陶瓷:脆弱的历史》。该系列中的所有三个程序都吸引人并且充满了迷人的细节。但是,我对系列​​的第三部分感到不安,感到失望,这与该系列的第三部分有关,该部分涉及英国工作室陶器的发展。从19世纪末到第二次世界大战之间的这段时期被很好地涵盖了,描述了伯纳德·里奇(Bernard Leach)及其追随者(例如迈克尔·卡德(Michael Cardew))的崛起。该计划声称,伯纳德·里奇(Bernard Leach)单手开发了工作室制陶,但没有得到正确解释的是他如何变得如此有影响力。在战后时期,特别是在1960年代和1970年代,如何建立了这么多工作室陶艺家?他们不可能全部都是从Leach's等一些开创性陶艺的学徒中脱颖而出的。还必须有其他大量手段来传播Leach的理想并普及工作室陶艺。教育机构,新的私人画廊和手工艺品组织都发挥了关键作用,但未在计划中提及。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ceramic review》 |2012年第254期|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 陶瓷工业;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号