首页> 外文期刊>Rural Sociology >Policing mechanisms in agricultural contracts.
【24h】

Policing mechanisms in agricultural contracts.

机译:农业合同中的警务机制。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this paper we focus on mechanisms of coordination in agricultural contracts. Our approach is intended to advance understanding of social relations of production and distribution of power in agrofood systems. Through an analysis of contracts between farmers and intermediaries (e.g., processors, shippers, consignment agents) for California (USA) fruits and vegetables, we identify 3 functions of contracts: they help to coordinate production; they provide incentives (and penalties) to induce particular behaviours and they allow farmers and intermediaries to share risk. These functions are implemented via 4 policing instruments: input control; monitoring; quality measurement; and revenue sharing. The instruments are employed by intermediaries to mitigate "blind spots" in contracts and to control farmers' actions and the quality of their output. This 'mechanism design' approach is complemented by a sociologically oriented analysis emphasizing the embeddedness of economic institutions. We problematize the stylized fashion in which the concept of authority has been treated in the contract farming literature, and propose an alternative approach to studying new organizational forms and divisions of labour among farmers and intermediaries.
机译:在本文中,我们重点关注农业合同中的协调机制。我们的方法旨在加深对农业食品系统中生产和权力分配的社会关系的了解。通过对美国加利福尼亚州水果和蔬菜的农民和中介机构(例如,加工商,托运人,寄售代理人)之间的合同进行分析,我们确定了合同的三个功能:它们有助于协调生产;它们提供诱因(和惩罚)来诱使特定行为,并且允许农民和中介机构分担风险。这些功能是通过4种管制工具实现的:输入控制;监控;质量测量;和收益分享。中介机构使用这些工具来减轻合同中的“盲点”,并控制农民的行为及其产出的质量。这种“机制设计”方法得到社会学分析的补充,强调经济制度的嵌入性。我们对合同农业文献中处理权威概念的风格化方式提出了质疑,并提出了一种替代方法来研究农民和中介机构之间的新组织形式和分工。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号