首页> 外文期刊>Biological Conservation >Using a five-factored structured decision analysis to evaluate the extinction risk of Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus)
【24h】

Using a five-factored structured decision analysis to evaluate the extinction risk of Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus)

机译:使用五因素结构化决策分析来评估大西洋st鱼(Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus)的灭绝风险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In 2005, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) National Marine Fisheries Service initiated a status review of Atlantic sturgeon to determine if the species warranted a threatened or endangered listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The Atlantic sturgeon status review team intended to rely on previously used methods to assess extinction risk, but found that most quantitative extinction risk analyses were performed on data-rich populations and often did not systematically consider the five factors specified in Section 4(a)(1) of the ESA as required for listing a species. Taking cues from structured decision analysis theory, the team created a framework, based around the five factors, which can be used to evaluate the status of data-poor species. Potential scoring biases were minimized in this analysis by providing experts with standardized reference points for scoring, dividing the analysis into smaller units, and using both individual and group opinion. Using this five-factored structured decision analysis, the status review team recommended that three of the five distinct population segments warranted listing as threatened. The status review team offers their approach to increase transparency about their scientific recommendation and to aid other teams who are tasked with systematically evaluating the status of data-poor species.
机译:2005年,美国国家海洋与大气管理局(NOAA)国家海洋渔业局启动了对大西洋st鱼的状态审查,以确定该物种是否根据《濒危物种法》(ESA)值得列入濒危物种清单。大西洋st鱼状态审查小组打算依靠以前使用的方法来评估灭绝风险,但发现大多数定量灭绝风险分析是针对数据丰富的种群进行的,并且通常没有系统地考虑第4(a)节中指定的五个因素。 1)列出物种所需的ESA。该团队从结构化决策分析理论中获取线索,围绕五个因素创建了一个框架,该框架可用于评估数据贫乏物种的状况。通过为专家提供评分的标准化参考点,将分析划分为较小的单元并同时使用个人和团体意见,可以最大程度地减少潜在的评分偏差。地位审查小组使用这种五因素结构化决策分析,建议在五个不同的人群中,有三个应列入威胁名单。状态审查小组提供了增加其科学建议透明度的方法,并协助其他小组系统地评估数据贫乏物种的状况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号