首页> 外文期刊>Ringing & Migration >Departure directions, migratory timing and non-breeding distribution of the Red-backed Shrike Lanius collurio: do ring re-encounters and light-based geolocator data tell the same story?
【24h】

Departure directions, migratory timing and non-breeding distribution of the Red-backed Shrike Lanius collurio: do ring re-encounters and light-based geolocator data tell the same story?

机译:红背伯劳拉尼厄斯collurio的发车方向,迁徙时机和非繁殖分布:环形再遇和基于光的地理定位器数据是否都讲述了同样的故事?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study explores differences and consistencies between ring re-encounter and light-based geolocator data from Red-backed Shrike when used for studying three aspects of bird migration: departure direction and its relationship with longitude and latitude, non-breeding distribution, and timing of migration. Departure directions were consistent between the two methods. They indicate a funnel-shaped migration with individuals from southwest Europe taking a detour via the eastern Mediterranean rather than migrating via Gibraltar. This indicates that an original migration route has been retained after colonisation of the breeding range. Non-breeding distributions differed substantially between birds ringed and re-encountered and birds tracked by geolocators. This difference may be due to spatio- temporal heterogeneity in ring re-encounter probability and/or due to the two samples of birds belonging to different populations. The monthly average ring re-encounter location moved later southward during autumn and earlier northward during spring migration than the geolocator positions, because of an over-representation of re-encounters in the north. The results emphasise the importance of combining different sources of data when analysing migration patterns of animals that are difficult to track.
机译:这项研究探索了红背伯劳的环再相遇和基于光的地理定位器数据之间的差异和一致性,这些数据用于研究鸟类迁徙的三个方面:出发方向及其与经度和纬度的关系,非繁殖分布以及迁徙的时间移民。两种方法之间的出发方向是一致的。它们表明一个漏斗状的移民,来自欧洲西南部的人们绕道绕过地中海东部,而不是通过直布罗陀来移民。这表明在繁殖范围定居后仍保留了原始的迁移途径。圈养和再遇到的鸟类与地理定位器追踪的鸟类之间的非繁殖分布差异很大。这种差异可能是由于环再次遇到概率的时空异质性和/或由于属于不同种群的两个鸟类样本所致。由于北部的重新遭遇人数过多,因此,平均每月重新接触的地点在秋季期间向南移动的时间较秋季晚,在春季迁移期间向北移动的时间早于地理定位器的位置。结果强调了在分析难以追踪的动物迁徙模式时组合不同数据来源的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号