首页> 外文期刊>Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering >Considerations on the European Standard EN 14157 Test Methods: Abrasion Resistance of Natural Stones Used for Flooring in Buildings
【24h】

Considerations on the European Standard EN 14157 Test Methods: Abrasion Resistance of Natural Stones Used for Flooring in Buildings

机译:关于欧洲标准EN 14157测试方法的考虑:用于建筑物地板的天然石材的耐磨性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In Europe, the Wide Wheel abrasion (WWA) test and the Bohme abrasion (BA) test are among the most widely used standard test methods for determining abrasion resistance of natural stones, the former being the reference test method in EN 14157 Standard. However, it is stated in the Annex-A (Informative) of EN 14157 Standard that very limited data are available to provide correlations between these two test methods. To be able to fill this gap, in this study, 25 different natural stones belonging to sedimentary, metamorphic and igneous groups were tested for their abrasion resistance as well as physico-mechanical properties. Also, for a better interpretation of abrasion resistance characteristics of the tested stone materials, relationships between abrasion resistance and physico-mechanical properties were statistically examined. A statistically significant linear correlation (R2 = 0.85; P value = 0.000) was established between the WWA test and the BA test, which could be used in practice for converting the measured abrasion resistance values from one testing method to another. It was also found that the correlation between these two test methods improved significantly (R2 - 0.93; P value = 0.001) when relatively high-porosity stone materials (porosity >1%) were separately evaluated. Both methods of abrasion resistance employed in the present study showed statistically significant linear correlations with uniaxial compressive strength and Brazilian tensile strength, the former proving to be a more influencing parameter on resistance to abrasion. Also, from the point view of representing actual abrasion mechanism of stone materials in practice, the necessity of simulating multidirectional foot traffic in abrasion testing methods was discussed. In this respect, the reference test method in the EN 14157 Standard was criticized for not fully meeting this requirement. It was also pointed out that the reference method could have some drawbacks when applied to coarse-grained granitic rocks having cleavable minerals such as plagioclase and orthoclase feldspars.
机译:在欧洲,宽轮磨耗(WWA)测试和Bohme磨耗(BA)测试是确定天然石材耐磨性的最广泛使用的标准测试方法,前者是EN 14157标准中的参考测试方法。但是,EN 14157标准的附录A(信息性)中指出,只有非常有限的数据可用于提供这两种测试方法之间的相关性。为了填补这一空白,在这项研究中,测试了25种不同的天然石材,它们分别属于沉积,变质和火成岩类,具有耐磨性和物理机械性能。另外,为了更好地解释被测石材的耐磨性,统计上检查了耐磨性与物理机械性能之间的关系。在WWA试验和BA试验之间建立了统计学上显着的线性相关性(R2 = 0.85; P值= 0.000),该线性相关性可在实践中用于将测得的耐磨性值从一种测试方法转换为另一种测试方法。还发现,当分别评估较高孔隙度的石材(孔隙度> 1%)时,这两种测试方法之间的相关性显着改善(R2-0.93; P值= 0.001)。本研究中使用的两种耐磨性方法均显示出与单轴抗压强度和巴西拉伸强度具有统计学意义的线性相关性,前者被证明是对耐磨性影响更大的参数。此外,从实际代表石材实际磨损机理的角度出发,讨论了在磨损测试方法中模拟多向步行流量的必要性。在这方面,EN 14157标准中的参考测试方法因未完全满足此要求而受到批评。还指出,该参考方法在应用于具有斜长石和正长石长石等可裂解矿物的粗粒花岗岩时可能会存在一些缺陷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号