首页> 外文期刊>Library & Information Science Research >Are we there yet?: Mixed methods research in library and information science
【24h】

Are we there yet?: Mixed methods research in library and information science

机译:我们到了吗?:图书馆和信息科学中的混合方法研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Mixed methods research (MMR)—which integrates qualitative and quantitative methods in one study to improve the study's quality—is not common in library and information science (LIS) and has not been discussed in its literature. While still evolving and generating much discussion about its nature and standards for its evaluation, MMR has been employed in the social and behavioral sciences for more than three decades. It is already considered the third approach to research, along with the quantitative and qualitative approaches. How did this approach shape research in LIS? An analysis of 465 articles published in four major LIS research journals revealed that 22 articles (5%) employed MMR. However, the recognition of MMR by name or as a research method was absent from these articles and from the methodological literature in LIS. The various strengths of MMR suggest that being cognizant of its possible use in LIS would benefit researchers in the field
机译:混合方法研究(MMR)在一项研究中整合了定性和定量方法以提高研究质量,这在图书馆和信息科学(LIS)中并不常见,在其文献中也没有进行讨论。尽管MMR仍在不断发展,并对其评估的性质和标准进行了很多讨论,但它已在社会和行为科学领域应用了三十多年。它已经被认为是第三种研究方法,以及定量和定性方法。这种方法如何影响LIS的研究?对四个主要LIS研究期刊上发表的465篇文章的分析显示,有22篇文章(占5%)采用MMR。但是,这些文章以及LIS的方法学文献都没有以名称或研究方法来识别MMR。 MMR的各种优势表明,认识到其在LIS中的可能用途将使该领域的研究人员受益

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号