...
首页> 外文期刊>Resuscitation. >Beyond the pre-shock pause: The effect of prehospital defibrillation mode on CPR interruptions and return of spontaneous circulation
【24h】

Beyond the pre-shock pause: The effect of prehospital defibrillation mode on CPR interruptions and return of spontaneous circulation

机译:超出休克前停顿:院前除颤模式对心肺复苏术中断和自发循环恢复的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Aims: The pattern of interruptions to chest compressions in pre-hospital cardiac arrests in Wellington, New Zealand, was examined prospectively to determine whether the mode of defibrillation chosen by paramedics influenced interruptions, shock success and the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Methods: A prospective observational cohort study of 44 adult cardiac arrests in which 203 shocks were administered by Wellington Free Ambulance (WFA) paramedics was undertaken to compare Code-stat? electronic records from Medtronic? Lifepak 12 and Lifepak 15 defibrillators used in semi-automated (AED) or manual mode. Interruptions during the 30s prior to shock delivery as well as pre-shock and post-shock pauses were calculated. Shock success and ROSC were the outcome measures. Results: Pre-shock pauses were shorter in manual mode (median 3. s, IQR 2-5) versus AED mode (median 4. s, IQR 3-6; p= 0.003). Interruptions of CPR in the 30. s prior to shock delivery were also shorter in manual mode (median 7. s, IQR 4-11) versus AED mode (median 14. s, IQR 12-16; p= 0.001). Shock success rates and post-shock pauses were not statistically different between modes. ROSC was significantly higher in manual mode (18.49%) versus AED mode (8.33%, p= 0.042). Conclusion: When paramedics used the defibrillator in manual mode as compared to AED mode, interruptions to CPR during the 30. s prior to shock delivery were significantly reduced and pre-shock pauses were also shorter. This was associated with increased ROSC. Manual defibrillation should be the preferred option for appropriately trained paramedics. Training in this locality has been changed accordingly.
机译:目的:前瞻性地检查了新西兰惠灵顿医院院前心脏骤停中胸外按压中断的模式,以确定护理人员选择的除颤方式是否影响中断,休克成功和自发循环的恢复。方法:一项前瞻性观察队列研究,对44例成人心脏骤停进行了研究,其中惠灵顿免费救护车(WFA)护理人员进行了203次电击,以比较Code-stat? Medtronic的电子记录?在半自动(AED)或手动模式下使用的Lifepak 12和Lifepak 15除颤器。计算了电击前30秒钟内的中断以及电击前和电击后的暂停时间。休克成功率和ROSC是结果指标。结果:与AED模式(中位数4. s,IQR 3-6; p = 0.003)相比,手动模式(中位数3. s,IQR 2-5)的休克前暂停时间短。与AED模式(中位数14. s,IQR 12-16; p = <0.001)相比,手动模式(中位数7. s,IQR 4-11)在电击前30 s的CPR中断也更短。两种模式之间的电击成功率和电击后暂停没有统计学差异。与AED模式(8.33%,p = 0.042)相比,手动模式下的ROSC显着更高(18.49%)。结论:与AED模式相比,当护理人员在手动模式下使用除颤器时,电击前30 s对CPR的中断显着减少,并且电击前暂停时间也更短。这与ROSC增加有关。对于经过适当培训的护理人员,手动除颤应该是首选。在该地区的培训已相应更改。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号