...
首页> 外文期刊>Resuscitation. >Single-shock defibrillation success in adult cardiac arrest: A systematic review
【24h】

Single-shock defibrillation success in adult cardiac arrest: A systematic review

机译:成人心脏骤停的单电击除颤成功:系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective: Current resuscitation guidelines advise a single biphasic shock followed by chest compressions; however, it is unclear if this applies to all waveforms and energy levels. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to determine the comparative success rates for single-shock defibrillation across waveforms evaluated in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Methods: EMBASE, MEDLINE, EBM Reviews, dissertation abstract databases, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched. Two investigators independently reviewed titles, abstracts and full texts in a hierarchical manner for study eligibility with a quadratic kappa score at each level. Two authors abstracted data independently and the quality of the articles was assessed using the five-point Jadad scale. Outcomes were termination of ventricular fibrillation (VF)/ventricular tachycardia (VT) at 5. s post shock (TOF), return of organized rhythm (ROOR) and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Results: A total of 3281 potentially relevant citations were identified and, of these, eight papers were selected with Kappa values of 0.53 for titles, 0.71 for abstracts, and 0.94 for articles. Quality scores varied from 0 to 4/5. Biphasic first-shock success for all three outcomes of interest was similar regardless of energy levels, and uniformly superior to monophasic first-shock success. Median time to first shock varied across trials based on level of randomization (first responders versus advanced life support tiered response) and may contribute to observed differences. Lack of variability across two waveforms precluded a meta-analytical approach. Conclusions: This systematic review suggests that evaluated biphasic waveforms have similar first-shock success as measured by the three outcomes of interest and all are superior to monophasic shocks.
机译:目的:目前的复苏指南建议先进行单相双相电击,再进行胸部按压。但是,尚不清楚这是否适用于所有波形和能级。我们对文献进行了系统的回顾,以确定在院外心脏骤停患者中评估的波形之间单次电击除颤的相对成功率。方法:搜索EMBASE,MEDLINE,EBM评论,论文摘要数据库和Clinicaltrials.gov。两名研究人员以分层的方式独立审查了标题,摘要和全文,以研究合格程度,每个级别的得分均为二次。两位作者独立提取数据,并使用五点Jadad量表评估了文章的质量。结果是在休克后5 s(TOF)终止室颤(VF)/室性心动过速(VT),恢复有组织的节律(ROOR)和恢复自发性循环(ROSC)。结果:总共鉴定到3281篇潜在相关的引文,其中八篇论文的Kappa值标题为0.53,摘要为0.71,文章为0.94。质量得分从0到4/5不等。无论能量水平如何,所有三个相关结果的双相首次电击成功均相似,并且均优于单相首次电击成功。根据随机化程度(初次应答者与晚期生命支持分层应答),各次试验中第一次电击的中位数时间有所不同,并且可能导致观察到的差异。由于两个波形之间缺乏可变性,因此无法进行荟萃分析。结论:该系统评价表明,根据感兴趣的三个结果测量,评估的双相波形具有相似的首次电击成功,并且均优于单相电击。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号