Does veno-arterial bypass without an artificial lung improve the outcome in dogs undergoing cardiac arrest?

摘要

We hypothesized that maintaining circulation and blood pressure by veno-arterial bypass (V-A bypass) without oxygenation would improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and survival rates. A total of 32 dogs, divided into four groups, were subjected to normothermic ventricular fibrillation (VF) for 15 min. The method of CPR was the same in the four groups, except for the method and timing of V-A bypass. We attempted to resuscitate the dogs without V-A bypass (control), with V-A bypass not including an artificial lung during VF, with V-A bypass not including an artificial lung during CPR, and with V-A bypass including an artificial lung during CPR. CPR was continued until restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) or for 30 min. Although blood pressure was well maintained, severe hypoxemia was observed during V-A bypass without an artificial lung. The resultant hypoxemia was very detrimental. ROSC was achieved more easily in all dogs in the bypass group with an artificial lung. No significant difference in survival rates was demonstrated among the four groups (P=0.11). We concluded that V-A bypass without oxygenation does not improve the chances for CPR and outcome after cardiac arrest in dogs. Our results suggest that oxygenation is indispensable in CPR.