...
首页> 外文期刊>Resuscitation. >The impact of increased chest compression fraction on return of spontaneous circulation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients not in ventricular fibrillation
【24h】

The impact of increased chest compression fraction on return of spontaneous circulation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients not in ventricular fibrillation

机译:非心室纤颤的院外心脏骤停患者胸部按压分数增加对自发循环恢复的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective: Greater chest compression fraction (CCF, or proportion of CPR time spent providing compressions) is associated with better survival for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA) patients in ventricular fibrillation (VF). We evaluated the effect of CCF on return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in OOHCA patients with non-VF ECG rhythms in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Epistry. Methods: This prospective cohort study included OOHCA patients if: not witnessed by EMS, no automated external defibrillator (AED) shock prior to EMS arrival, received >1. min of CPR with CPR process measures available, and initial non-VF rhythm. We reviewed the first 5. min of electronic CPR records following defibrillator application, measuring the proportion of compressions/min during the resuscitation. Results: Demographics of 2103 adult patients from 10 U.S. and Canadian centers were: mean age 67.8; male 61.2%; public location 10.6%; bystander witnessed 32.9%; bystander CPR 35.4%; median interval from 911 to defibrillator turned on 8. min:27. s; initial rhythm asystole 64.0%, PEA 28.0%, other non-shockable 8.0%; median compression rate 110/min; median CCF 71%; ROSC 24.2%; survival to hospital discharge 2.0%. The estimated linear effect on adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (OR; 95%CI) of ROSC for each 10% increase in CCF was (1.05; 0.99, 1.12). Adjusted (OR; 95%CI) of ROSC for each CCF category were: 0-40% (reference group); 41-60% (1.14; 0.72, 1.81); 61-80% (1.42; 0.92, 2.20); and 81-100% (1.48; 0.94, 2.32). Conclusions: This is the first study to demonstrate that increased CCF among non-VF OOHCA patients is associated with a trend toward increased likelihood of ROSC.
机译:目的:较大的胸部按压分数(CCF或提供按压所花费的CPR时间的比例)与室颤(VF)的院外心脏骤停(OOHCA)患者的更好生存相关。我们评估了复苏结果联合体Epistry中非VF ECG节律的OOHCA患者中CCF对自发循环(ROSC)返回的影响。方法:这项前瞻性队列研究包括以下情况的OOHCA患者:未通过EMS见证,在EMS到达之前未发生自动体外除颤器(AED)休克,且> 1。 CPR的最小值,包括可用的CPR流程测量值和初始非VF节奏。在使用除颤器后,我们回顾了前5分钟的电子CPR记录,测量了复苏过程中每分钟按压的比例。结果:来自美国10个中心和加拿大中心的2103名成人患者的人口统计学特征是:平均年龄67.8;男性61.2%;公共场所10.6%;旁观者见证了32.9%;旁观者心肺复苏35.4%;从911到除颤器的中位间隔打开8.分钟:27。 s;初始心律停搏64.0%,PEA 28.0%,其他不可电击8.0%;中值压缩率110 / min;中位数CCF为71%; ROSC 24.2%;出院生存率2.0%。每增加10%CCF,ROSC为95%置信区间(OR; 95%CI)时,对调整后的优势比的估计线性效应为(1.05; 0.99,1.12)。每个CCF类别的ROSC调整后的(或; 95%CI)为:0-40%(参考组); 41-60%(1.14; 0.72,1.81); 61-80%(1.42; 0.92,2.20);和81-100%(1.48; 0.94,2.32)。结论:这是第一项证明非VF OOHCA患者CCF增加与ROSC可能性增加趋势相关的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号