...
首页> 外文期刊>Natural Resources Forum >Are soil conservation technologies “win-win?” A case study of Anjeni in the north-western Ethiopian highlands
【24h】

Are soil conservation technologies “win-win?” A case study of Anjeni in the north-western Ethiopian highlands

机译:土壤保护技术是否“双赢”?埃塞俄比亚西北部高地安耶尼的个案研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study measures the impact of fanya juu terraces on the net value of crop income in a high-rainfall area in the Ethiopian highlands using cross-sectional multiple plot observations. Using propensity score matching methods we find that the net value of crop income for plots with fanya juu terraces is lower than for plots without fanya juu terraces. This finding makes it difficult to avoid concluding that while the technologies might reduce soil erosion and associated off-site effects, they do so at the expense of poor farmers in the Ethiopian highlands. Therefore, fanya juu terraces cannot be characterized as a “win-win” measure to reduce soil erosion. New agricultural technologies need to be profitable to the farmer if they are to be adopted and sustained.
机译:这项研究使用横断面多地块观测法,测量了范亚尤阶地对埃塞俄比亚高原高雨地区农作物收入净值的影响。使用倾向得分匹配方法,我们发现带有番fan酒阶地的地块的农作物净收入低于没有番ya酒阶地的地块。这一发现很难避免得出这样的结论:尽管这些技术可以减少土壤侵蚀和相关的异地影响,但这样做却以牺牲埃塞俄比亚高地的贫困农民为代价。因此,范亚尤阶地不能被描述为减少土壤侵蚀的“双赢”措施。如果要采用和维持新的农业技术,农民就必须从中获利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号