...
首页> 外文期刊>Resuscitation. >Ischemic post-conditioning and vasodilator therapy during standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation to reduce cardiac and brain injury after prolonged untreated ventricular fibrillation
【24h】

Ischemic post-conditioning and vasodilator therapy during standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation to reduce cardiac and brain injury after prolonged untreated ventricular fibrillation

机译:标准心肺复苏过程中的缺血后适应和血管舒张治疗可减少长时间未经治疗的心室纤颤后的心脑损伤

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aim of the study: We investigated the effects of ischemic postconditioning (IPC) with and without cardioprotective vasodilatory therapy (CVT) at the initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on cardio-cerebral function and 48-h survival. Methods: Prospective randomized animal study. Following 15. min of ventricular fibrillation, 42 Yorkshire farm pigs weighing an average of 34. ±. 2. kg were randomized to receive standard CPR (SCPR, n= 12), SCPR. +. IPC (n= 10), SCPR. +. IPC. +. CVT (n= 10), or SCPR. +. CVT (n= 10). IPC was delivered during the first 3. min of CPR with 4 cycles of 20. s of chest compressions followed by 20-s pauses. CVT consisted of intravenous sodium nitroprusside (2. mg) and adenosine (24. mg) during the first minute of CPR. Epinephrine was given in all groups per standard protocol. A transthoracic echocardiogram was obtained on all survivors 1 and 4. h post-ROSC. The brains were extracted after euthanasia at least 24. h later to assess ischemic injury in 7 regions. Ischemic injury was graded on a 0-4 scale with (0. = no injury to 4 ≥50% neural injury). The sum of the regional scores was reported as cerebral histological score (CHS). 48. h survival was reported. Results: Post-resuscitation left ventricular ejection (LVEF) fraction improved in SCPR. +. CVT, SCPR. +. IPC. +. CVT and SCPR. +. IPC groups compared to SCPR (59%. ±. 9%, 52%. ±. 14%, 52%. ±. 14% vs. 35%. ±. 11%, respectively, p<. 0.05). Only SCPR. +. IPC and SCPR. +. IPC. +. CVT, but not SCPR. +. CVT, had lower mean CHS compared to SCPR (5.8. ±. 2.6, 2.8. ±. 1.8 vs. 10. ±. 2.1, respectively, p<. 0.01). The 48-h survival among SCPR. +. IPC, SCPR. +. CVT, SCPR. +. IPC. +. CVT and SCPR was 6/10, 3/10, 5/10 and 1/12, respectively (Cox regression p<. 0.01). Conclusions: IPC and CVT during standard CPR improved post-resuscitation LVEF but only IPC was independently neuroprotective and improved 48-h survival after 15. min of untreated cardiac arrest in pigs.
机译:研究的目的:我们在开始心肺复苏(CPR)时,对有无心脏保护性血管扩张疗法(CVT)的缺血后处理(IPC)对心脑功能和48小时生存的影响进行了研究。方法:前瞻性随机动物研究。心室纤颤15分钟后,约克郡的42头猪平均体重为34.±。 2.将kg随机分组以接受标准CPR(SCPR,n = 12),SCPR。 +。 IPC(n = 10),SCPR。 +。 IPC。 +。 CVT(n = 10)或SCPR。 +。 CVT(n = 10)。 IPC在心肺复苏术的前3.分钟内进行,共进行4个20 s胸部按压周期,然后进行20 s暂停。在CPR的第一分钟内,CVT由静脉硝普钠(2. mg)和腺苷(24. mg)组成。根据标准方案在所有组中给予肾上腺素。在ROSC后1小时和4小时,所有幸存者均获得了经胸超声心动图。安乐死后至少24小时后抽取大脑,以评估7个区域的缺血性损伤。缺血性损伤的评分等级为0-4,其中(0. = 4≥50%神经损伤无损伤)。区域得分的总和被报告为脑组织学得分(CHS)。 48. h存活的报道。结果:SCPR中复苏后的左心室射血分数(LVEF)改善。 +。 CVT,SCPR。 +。 IPC。 +。 CVT和SCPR。 +。 IPC组与SCPR相比(分别为59%。±.9%,52%。±.14%,52%。±.14%和35%。±.11%,p <.0.05)。只有SCPR。 +。 IPC和SCPR。 +。 IPC。 +。 CVT,但不是SCPR。 +。与SCPR相比,CVT的平均CHS较低(分别为5.8。±2.6、2.8.1.8和10.±2.1,p <.0.01)。 SCPR中的48小时生存时间。 +。 IPC,SCPR。 +。 CVT,SCPR。 +。 IPC。 +。 CVT和SCPR分别为6 / 10、3 / 10、5 / 10和1/12(Cox回归p <.0.01)。结论:标准CPR期间的IPC和CVT改善了复苏后的LVEF,但只有IPC具有独立的神经保护作用,并改善了未经治疗的心脏骤停15分钟后猪的48小时生存率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号