...
首页> 外文期刊>Resuscitation. >Improved chest recoil using an adhesive glove device for active compression-decompression CPR in a pediatric manikin model.
【24h】

Improved chest recoil using an adhesive glove device for active compression-decompression CPR in a pediatric manikin model.

机译:在儿童人体模型中使用粘性手套装置进行主动压缩-减压CPR的改进后坐力。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: We developed an adhesive glove device (AGD) to perform ACD-CPR in pediatric manikins, hypothesizing that AGD-ACD-CPR provides better chest decompression compared to standard (S)-CPR. DESIGN: Split-plot design randomizing 16 subjects to test four manikin-technique models in a crossover fashion to AGD-ACD-CPR vs. S-CPR. Healthcare providers performed 5min of CPR with 30:2 compression:ventilation ratio in the four manikin models: (1) adolescent; (2) child two-hand; (3) child one-hand; and (4) infant two-thumb. METHODS: Modified manikins recorded compression pressure (CP), compression depth (CD) and decompression depth (DD). The AGD consisted of a modified oven mitt with an adjustable strap; a Velcro patch was sewn to the palmer aspect. The counter Velcro patch was bonded to the anterior chest wall. For infant CPR, the thumbs of two oven mitts were stitched together with Velcro. Subjects were asked to actively pull up during decompression. Subjects' heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR) and recovery time (RT) for HR/RR to return to baseline were recorded. Subjects were blinded to data recordings. Data (mean+/-SEM) were analyzed using a two-tailed paired t-test. Significance was defined qualitatively as P< or =0.05. RESULTS: Mean decompression depth difference was significantly greater with AGD-ACD-CPR compared to S-CPR; 38-75% of subjects achieved chest decompression to or beyond baseline. AGD-ACD-CPR provided 6-12% fewer chest compressions/minute than S-CPR group. There was no significant difference in CD, CP, HR, RR and RT within each group comparing both techniques. CONCLUSION: A simple, inexpensive glove device for ACD-CPR improved chest decompression with emphasis on active pull in manikins without excessive rescuer fatigue. The clinical implication of fewer compressions/minute in the AGD group needs to be evaluated.
机译:目的:我们开发了一种胶粘手套装置(AGD)来对小儿人体模型进行ACD-CPR,假设与标准(S)-CPR相比,AGD-ACD-CPR可提供更好的胸部减压效果。设计:地块设计将16位受试者随机分配,以对AGD-ACD-CPR与S-CPR的交叉测试四个人体模型技术模型。在四种人体模型中,医疗保健提供者以30:2的压缩比:换气比执行5分钟的CPR:(1)青少年; (2)小孩双手; (3)儿童单手; (4)婴儿两拇指。方法:改良人体模型记录压缩压力(CP),压缩深度(CD)和减压深度(DD)。 AGD由改进的烤箱手套和可调节皮带组成。将维可牢(Velcro)贴片缝到掌心。对应的维可牢尼龙搭扣贴片粘合到前胸壁。对于婴儿心肺复苏术,将两个烤箱手套的拇指用维可牢尼龙搭扣缝合在一起。受试者被要求在减压过程中积极起立。记录受试者的心率(HR),呼吸频率(RR)和恢复时间(RT),以使HR / RR返回基线。受试者对数据记录视而不见。使用两尾配对t检验分析数据(平均值+/- SEM)。显着性定义为P <或= 0.05。结果:与S-CPR相比,AGD-ACD-CPR的平均减压深度差异明显更大; 38-75%的受试者达到了胸部减压水平,甚至超过了基线水平。与S-CPR组相比,AGD-ACD-CPR提供的胸外按压/分钟减少了6-12%。比较这两种技术,每组的CD,CP,HR,RR和RT均无显着差异。结论:一种用于ACD-CPR的简单,廉价的手套设备可改善胸部减压,并重点在于主动拉动人体模型而不会使救助者过度疲劳。需要评估AGD组减少每次按压的临床意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号