首页> 外文期刊>Resuscitation. >Correlations between cardiac output, stroke volume, central venous pressure, intra-abdominal pressure and total circulating blood volume in resuscitation of major burns.
【24h】

Correlations between cardiac output, stroke volume, central venous pressure, intra-abdominal pressure and total circulating blood volume in resuscitation of major burns.

机译:严重烧伤复苏时心输出量,中风量,中心静脉压,腹腔内压力与总循环血量之间的相关性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The purpose of this study was to observe the interactions between cardiac index (CI), stroke volume index (SVI), central venous pressure (CVP), intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and total circulating blood volume index (TBVI) during resuscitation of major burns. Sixteen patients with an average TBSA of 46% (26-67%) and an average abbreviated burn severity index of 8.9 (7-11) were included into an intra-individual comparative prospective study over an 18-month period. The COLD Z-021 system (Pulsion Medical Systems, Munich, Germany) was used to obtain CI, SVI and TBVI. Two hundred and thirty-four to 278 intra-individually comparative measurements were performed for the analyses during the first 4 days after the burn injury. Correlations were shown for the interactions between CI and TBVI (r = 0.550; rs = 0.518), SVI and TBVI (r = 0.606; rs = 0.626) and for CVP versus IAP (r = 0.487; rs = 0.474). Poor or no correlations were demonstrated for the comparisons CI versus CVP (r = 0.401; rs = 0.352), CVP-PEEP versus IAP (r = 0.255; rs = 0.272). TBVI versus IAP (r = -0.120; rs = -0.169), TBVI versus CVP (r = 0.025; rs = -0.036), TBVI versus CVP-PEEP (r = -0.046; rs = -0.101), CI versus CVP-PEEP (r = 0.088; rs = 0.092) as well as for IAP versus CI (r = 0.050; rs = 0.034). An additional analysis demonstrated no correlation between TBVI and MAP (r = -0.095; rs -0.136). Our data provide evidence that the CVP is influenced more by external pressures (IAP) than by the actual intravascular volume status of the patient. Thus, the CVP is not a suitable tool to guide fluid resuscitation during burns with shock. The TBVI may be an ideal value to guide resuscitation because the augmentation of TBVI during fluid resuscitation correlated well with improved cardiac output and stroke volume. Future randomised studies are required to demonstrate whether TBVI guided resuscitation of burns has an impact on outcome.
机译:这项研究的目的是观察心脏复苏期间心脏指数(CI),中风量指数(SVI),中心静脉压(CVP),腹腔内压力(IAP)和总循环血容量指数(TBVI)之间的相互作用。严重烧伤。 16例平均TBSA为46%(26-67%),平均缩写烧伤严重度指数为8.9(7-11)的患者纳入了18个月的个体内比较前瞻性研究。使用COLD Z-021系统(Pulsion Medical Systems,德国慕尼黑)获得CI,SVI和TBVI。在烧伤后的前4天内,进行了243次至278次的个体内比较测量。显示了CI和TBVI(r = 0.550; rs = 0.518),SVI和TBVI(r = 0.606; rs = 0.626)之间的相关性以及CVP与IAP的相关性(r = 0.487; rs = 0.474)。 CI与CVP(r = 0.401; rs = 0.352),CVP-PEEP与IAP(r = 0.255; rs = 0.272)的比较表明相关性差或没有相关性。 TBVI与IAP(r = -0.120; rs = -0.169),TBVI与CVP(r = 0.025; rs = -0.036),TBVI与CVP-PEEP(r = -0.046; rs = -0.101),CI与CVP- PEEP(r = 0.088; rs = 0.092)以及IAP对CI(r = 0.050; rs = 0.034)。进一步的分析表明TBVI和MAP之间无相关性(r = -0.095; rs -0.136)。我们的数据提供了证据,表明CVP受外部压力(IAP)的影响大于受患者实际血管内容积状态的影响。因此,CVP并不是引导休克烧伤过程中进行液体复苏的合适工具。 TBVI可能是指导复苏的理想值,因为在液体复苏过程中TBVI的增加与心输出量和卒中量的改善密切相关。需要未来的随机研究来证明TBVI指导的烧伤复苏对结局是否有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号